Howard E. Herl

425 citations
10 papers · 273 indexed · h-index 8

Howard E. Herl

10 papers receiving 219 citations

Peers

Howard E. Herl
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 156
  • Computer Science Applications 41
  • Education 137
  • Communication 27
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 32
Replace H.F. O’Neil with:
H.F. O’Neil United States
Douglas Harvey United States
Earl R. Misanchuk Canada
J. Terry Mayes United Kingdom
Kanji Akahori Japan
J. T. Mayes United Kingdom
Frank Loll Germany
Jozef Colpaert Belgium
Claudia Adams New Zealand
Howard E. Herl relative to H.F. O’Neil United States H.F. O’Neil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H.F. O’Neil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Howard E. Herl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Howard E. Herl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Howard E. Herl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Howard E. Herl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Howard E. Herl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Howard E. Herl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Howard E. Herl. The network helps show where Howard E. Herl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Howard E. Herl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Howard E. Herl Line = papers co-authored together Howard E. Herl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Examining the Validity of Knowledge Mapping as a Measure of Elementary Students' Scientific Understanding. CSE Technical Report.
20029
2 20009
3 199958
4
Computer-Based Collaborative Knowledge Mapping To Measure Team Processes and Team Outcomes.
19997
5 199942
6 199968
7
Feasibility of an On-line Concept Mapping Construction and Scoring System
19978
8
Use of Networked Collaborative Concept Mapping To Measure Team Processes and Team Outcomes
19979
9 199658
10 19935

About Howard E. Herl

Howard E. Herl is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Computer Science Applications and Education, having authored 10 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (2 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (1 paper) and Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (156 citations), Computer Science Applications (41 citations), Education (137 citations), Communication (27 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (32 citations). Howard E. Herl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gregory K. W. K. Chung, H.F. O’Neil, John Schacter, David Niemi, Eva L. Baker, Harold F. O’Neil, John J. Lee, Shuling Wang and Richard A. Dennis. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, The Journal of Educational Research, Cybernetics & Systems and American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026