Jonathan J. James

62 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Jonathan J. James
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Health Informatics 114
  • Cancer Research 532
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 613
  • Oncology 700
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 432
Replace Jee Suk Chang with:
Jee Suk Chang South Korea
Başak E. Doğan United States
Soo Yeon Hahn South Korea
Joo Hee South Korea
Miri Sklair‐Levy Israel
Nisha Sharma United Kingdom
Haydee Ojeda‐Fournier United States
Helga S. Marques United States
Luca Nicosia Italy
Tamim Niazi Canada
Jonathan J. James relative to Jee Suk Chang South Korea Jee Suk Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Jee Suk Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan J. James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan J. James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan J. James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan J. James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan J. James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan J. James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan J. James. The network helps show where Jonathan J. James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan J. James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan J. James Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan J. James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008195
2 2003153
3 2004128
4 2003123
5 2003110
6 200789
7 201867
8 201666
9 200665
10 201649
11 200842
12 202142
13 200339
14 200438
15 202337
16 200837
17 201536
18 201334
19 200330
20 200827

About Jonathan J. James

Jonathan J. James is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (24 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (22 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (17 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (17 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (17 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (114 citations), Cancer Research (532 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (613 citations), Oncology (700 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (432 citations). Jonathan J. James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Sarah E. Pinder, Eleanor Cornford, H.C. Burrell, Andrew Evans, Stephen Chan, Kwok‐Leung Cheung, Ian O. Ellis, Eleanor Gutteridge, Andy Evans and J.F.R. Robertson. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Radiology, Breast Cancer Research, Radiology, British Journal of Radiology and The Breast.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact