Hai Yap Teoh
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ferdinand A. GulJames GuthrieBrian AndrewHerbert SchochRobert P. ShannonM. C. ErNagashekhara Molugulu
- Topics
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers)Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers)Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Hai Yap Teoh
15 papers receiving 534 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Strategy and Management 332
- Accounting 262
- Marketing 149
- Management of Technology and Innovation 110
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 91
Countries citing papers authored by Hai Yap Teoh
This map shows the geographic impact of Hai Yap Teoh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hai Yap Teoh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hai Yap Teoh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hai Yap Teoh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hai Yap Teoh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hai Yap Teoh. The network helps show where Hai Yap Teoh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hai Yap Teoh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hai Yap Teoh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hai Yap Teoh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hai Yap Teoh. Hai Yap Teoh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | An experience in e-learning: Using an electronic textbook | 24 |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 136 | |
| 10 | 87 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 106 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | Interactive Effects of Evaluation Style and Organizational Structure Characteristics of Autonomy and Interdependence on Subunit Managerial Performance | 0 |
| 17 | 193 | |
| 18 | A Field Experimental Study of the Impact of Social Responsibility Disclosure on Institutional Investment Decision-Making | 0 |
| 19 | Impact of Floating Exchange Rates on Company Risk Management Practices: The Australian Experience | 2 |
About Hai Yap Teoh
Hai Yap Teoh is a scholar working on Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers) and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (262 citations), Strategy and Management (332 citations) and Marketing (149 citations). Hai Yap Teoh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Ferdinand A. Gul, James Guthrie, Brian Andrew, Herbert Schoch, Robert P. Shannon, M. C. Er and Nagashekhara Molugulu. Their work appears in journals such as MIS Quarterly, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of Business Venturing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.