Gustav Kuhn

3.2k total citations
88 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Gustav Kuhn is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Gustav Kuhn has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 42 papers in Social Psychology and 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Gustav Kuhn's work include Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (33 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (25 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (17 papers). Gustav Kuhn is often cited by papers focused on Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (33 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (25 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (17 papers). Gustav Kuhn collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Switzerland. Gustav Kuhn's co-authors include Ronald A. Rensink, Geoff G. Cole, Benjamin W. Tatler, Alan Kingstone, Kaitlin Laidlaw, Tom Foulsham, Zoltán Dienes, Valerie Benson, John M. Findlay and Jason Tipples and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Investigation and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Gustav Kuhn

82 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gustav Kuhn United Kingdom 27 1.5k 898 401 349 169 88 2.2k
Paola Ricciardelli Italy 18 1.6k 1.1× 514 0.6× 556 1.4× 235 0.7× 194 1.1× 69 2.1k
Jelena Ristic Canada 23 2.1k 1.4× 458 0.5× 550 1.4× 354 1.0× 158 0.9× 68 2.4k
Alexandra Frischen Canada 15 2.0k 1.4× 742 0.8× 769 1.9× 357 1.0× 161 1.0× 19 2.5k
Giovanni Galfano Italy 27 1.9k 1.2× 410 0.5× 733 1.8× 275 0.8× 143 0.8× 71 2.3k
Daniël Schreij Netherlands 8 1.5k 1.0× 375 0.4× 666 1.7× 369 1.1× 141 0.8× 15 2.2k
Chris Kelland Friesen Canada 19 2.6k 1.7× 733 0.8× 813 2.0× 409 1.2× 255 1.5× 23 3.0k
Michael J. Hove United States 22 2.0k 1.3× 1.2k 1.3× 660 1.6× 197 0.6× 172 1.0× 40 2.7k
Mowei Shen China 25 1.3k 0.8× 538 0.6× 337 0.8× 199 0.6× 65 0.4× 164 1.7k
Jan W. de Fockert United Kingdom 21 2.6k 1.7× 536 0.6× 997 2.5× 264 0.8× 121 0.7× 44 3.3k
Hillel Aviezer Israel 19 1.4k 1.0× 818 0.9× 1.2k 2.9× 153 0.4× 182 1.1× 43 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Gustav Kuhn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gustav Kuhn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gustav Kuhn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gustav Kuhn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gustav Kuhn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gustav Kuhn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gustav Kuhn. The network helps show where Gustav Kuhn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gustav Kuhn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gustav Kuhn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gustav Kuhn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gustav Kuhn. Gustav Kuhn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2025). Challenging magicians’ intuitive insights: The role of audience participation in experiencing a magic trick.. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts.
2.
Cole, Geoff G. & Gustav Kuhn. (2024). What Can Conjuring Tell Us About Cognition? The Future of the Science of Magic. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 34(1). 64–70.
3.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2024). Magic for the blind: are auditory tricks impossible?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 28(11). 971–973.
4.
5.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2023). A balanced view of impossible aesthetics: An empirical investigation of how impossibility relates to our enjoyment of magic tricks. i-Perception. 14(1). 1243923465–1243923465. 3 indexed citations
6.
Grietens, Koen Peeters, et al.. (2022). Misdirection in Global Health. Science & Technology Studies. 35(2). 2–12. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kuhn, Gustav, Patricia Kingori, & Koen Peeters Grietens. (2022). Misdirection – Magic, Psychology and its Application. Science & Technology Studies. 35(2). 13–29.
8.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2022). Experiencing misinformation: The effect of pre-exposure warnings and debunking on psychic beliefs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 76(6). 1445–1456. 2 indexed citations
9.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2022). Supporting the psychological health of our students: An arts-based community magic workshop for adapting to university life.. Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice. 9(3). 285–303. 3 indexed citations
10.
Spence, Charles, Jozef Youssef, & Gustav Kuhn. (2020). Magic on the Menu: Where Are All the Magical Food and Beverage Experiences?. Foods. 9(3). 257–257. 8 indexed citations
11.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2020). Talking to the Dead in the Classroom: How a Supposedly Psychic Event Impacts Beliefs and Feelings. Psychological Reports. 124(6). 2427–2452. 5 indexed citations
12.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2020). Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will. Psychological Research. 85(4). 1380–1390. 9 indexed citations
13.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2020). Influencing choices with conversational primes: How a magic trick unconsciously influences card choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(30). 17675–17679. 10 indexed citations
14.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2020). The apparent action causation: Using a magician forcing technique to investigate our illusory sense of agency over the outcome of our choices. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 73(11). 1784–1795. 11 indexed citations
15.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2020). The magician’s choice: Providing illusory choice and sense of agency with the equivoque forcing technique.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 150(7). 1358–1372. 7 indexed citations
16.
Lan, Yuxuan, et al.. (2018). Fake science: The impact of pseudo-psychological demonstrations on people’s beliefs in psychological principles. PLoS ONE. 13(11). e0207629–e0207629. 9 indexed citations
17.
Kuhn, Gustav, et al.. (2015). Requiem, KV 626. Bärenreiter eBooks.
18.
Kingstone, Alan, et al.. (2011). Now You See It, Now You Dont: how social cues and questions misdirect our attention. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 1 indexed citations
19.
Kuhn, Gustav, Valerie Benson, Sue Fletcher‐Watson, et al.. (2009). Eye movements affirm: automatic overt gaze and arrow cueing for typical adults and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Experimental Brain Research. 201(2). 155–165. 65 indexed citations
20.
Kuhn, Gustav & Valerie Benson. (2007). The influence of eye-gaze and arrow pointing distractor cues on voluntary eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics. 69(6). 966–971. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paola Ricciardelli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jelena Ristic Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexandra Frischen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Giovanni Galfano Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniël Schreij Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chris Kelland Friesen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael J. Hove Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mowei Shen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jan W. de Fockert Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hillel Aviezer
Rankless by CCL
2026