John M. Findlay

10.1k total citations · 3 hit papers
128 papers, 7.1k citations indexed

About

John M. Findlay is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Findlay has authored 128 papers receiving a total of 7.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 80 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 18 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 17 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in John M. Findlay's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (61 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (28 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (16 papers). John M. Findlay is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (61 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (28 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (16 papers). John M. Findlay collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. John M. Findlay's co-authors include Robin Walker, Iain D. Gilchrist, Hermann J. Müller, M. C. Shepherd, Robert Hockey, Sue Fletcher‐Watson, Alastair G. Gale, Valerie J. Brown, Valerie Benson and Susan Leekam and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Brain and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

John M. Findlay

121 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Hit Papers

A model of saccade generation based on parallel proce... 1982 2026 1996 2011 1999 1982 1986 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John M. Findlay United Kingdom 40 5.8k 1.3k 1.2k 1.0k 675 128 7.1k
Eileen Kowler United States 42 5.2k 0.9× 731 0.6× 1.0k 0.9× 1.1k 1.1× 378 0.6× 74 6.2k
Iain D. Gilchrist United Kingdom 40 4.1k 0.7× 794 0.6× 1.5k 1.2× 886 0.8× 427 0.6× 176 5.7k
Barbara Anne Dosher United States 50 7.3k 1.3× 1.4k 1.1× 766 0.7× 298 0.3× 899 1.3× 145 8.8k
Bruce Bridgeman United States 45 6.0k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 417 0.4× 555 0.5× 397 0.6× 173 7.0k
Ralf Engbert Germany 38 5.2k 0.9× 1.0k 0.8× 772 0.7× 1.6k 1.5× 2.0k 3.0× 121 6.8k
J. Kevin Ο’Regan France 39 7.1k 1.2× 2.2k 1.7× 939 0.8× 1.1k 1.0× 2.1k 3.2× 108 9.1k
Mary Hayhoe United States 46 6.7k 1.1× 982 0.8× 2.5k 2.2× 2.3k 2.2× 761 1.1× 171 9.4k
Ignace T. C. Hooge Netherlands 38 2.5k 0.4× 700 0.5× 831 0.7× 1.6k 1.5× 285 0.4× 148 4.4k
Irvin Rock United States 45 6.2k 1.1× 2.1k 1.6× 1.2k 1.0× 380 0.4× 682 1.0× 107 8.5k
Ken Nakayama United States 34 5.8k 1.0× 1.9k 1.5× 1.4k 1.2× 213 0.2× 325 0.5× 99 6.8k

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Findlay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Findlay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Findlay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Findlay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Findlay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Findlay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Findlay. The network helps show where John M. Findlay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Findlay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Findlay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Findlay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Findlay. John M. Findlay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Findlay, John M., Marianne Hollyman, Steve Hornby, et al.. (2023). Results of the ARROW survey of anti-reflux practice in the United Kingdom. Diseases of the Esophagus. 36(10). 1 indexed citations
2.
Thakurta, Joyashish & John M. Findlay. (2013). Geochemical constraints on the origin of palladium, copper and gold mineralization in the Salt Chuck mafic-ultramafic intrusion in southeastern Alaska. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2013. 1 indexed citations
3.
Findlay, John M., et al.. (2010). Education in the Foundation Programme: what doctors are doing and why.. 3(1). 11–15. 3 indexed citations
4.
Blythe, Hazel I., Simon P. Liversedge, & John M. Findlay. (2010). The effective fusional range for words in a natural viewing situation. Vision Research. 50(16). 1559–1570. 12 indexed citations
5.
Fletcher‐Watson, Sue, et al.. (2009). The development of change blindness: children's attentional priorities whilst viewing naturalistic scenes. Developmental Science. 12(3). 438–445. 20 indexed citations
6.
Findlay, John M. & Hazel I. Blythe. (2008). Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?. Vision Research. 49(10). 1267–1274. 28 indexed citations
7.
Blythe, Hazel I., Simon P. Liversedge, Holly Joseph, et al.. (2006). The binocular coordination of eye movements during reading in children and adults. Vision Research. 46(22). 3898–3908. 89 indexed citations
8.
Liversedge, Simon P., Keith Rayner, Sarah J. White, John M. Findlay, & Eugene McSorley. (2006). Binocular Coordination of the Eyes during Reading. Current Biology. 16(17). 1726–1729. 64 indexed citations
9.
Vergilino‐Perez, Dorine & John M. Findlay. (2006). Between-object and within-object saccade programming in a visual search task. Vision Research. 46(14). 2204–2216. 17 indexed citations
10.
Findlay, John M. & Valerie J. Brown. (2005). Eye scanning of multi-element displays: I. Scanpath planning. Vision Research. 46(1-2). 179–195. 34 indexed citations
11.
Findlay, John M. & Valerie J. Brown. (2005). Eye scanning of multi-element displays: II. Saccade planning. Vision Research. 46(1-2). 216–227. 31 indexed citations
12.
Liversedge, Simon P., Keith Rayner, Sarah J. White, et al.. (2004). Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?. Vision Research. 44(10). 1013–1024. 70 indexed citations
13.
Vergilino‐Perez, Dorine & John M. Findlay. (2003). Foveal stimulation and saccadic latencies. Experimental Brain Research. 150(2). 255–258. 8 indexed citations
14.
Gilchrist, Iain D., Charles A. Heywood, & John M. Findlay. (2003). Visual sensitivity in search tasks depends on the response requirement. Spatial Vision. 16(3). 277–293. 14 indexed citations
15.
Gilchrist, Iain D., Charles A. Heywood, & John M. Findlay. (1999). Saccade selection in visual search: evidence for spatial frequency specific between-item interactions. Vision Research. 39(7). 1373–1383. 23 indexed citations
16.
Waters, Andrew J., Geoffrey Underwood, & John M. Findlay. (1997). Studying expertise in music reading: Use of a pattern-matching paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics. 59(4). 477–488. 67 indexed citations
17.
Findlay, John M. & Fiona N. Newell. (1995). Perceptual cues and object recognition. 113–130. 3 indexed citations
18.
Findlay, John M.. (1995). “Starkfest” Vision and Clinic Science Special Issue. Optometry and Vision Science. 72(7). 461–466. 23 indexed citations
19.
Findlay, John M. & Laurence R. Harris. (1993). Horizontal saccades to dichoptically presented targets of differing disparities. Vision Research. 33(7). 1001–1010. 14 indexed citations
20.
Davies, Scott, John M. Findlay, & Anthony J. Lambert. (1989). The perception and tracking of state changes in complex systems. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 510–517. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026