Grant E. Donnelly

19 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Grant E. Donnelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Applied Psychology 56
  • General Decision Sciences 18
  • Marketing 67
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 42
  • Social Psychology 54
Replace Laurens van Gestel with:
Laurens van Gestel Netherlands
Tina A.G. Venema Netherlands
Loreen Mamerow Australia
Redzo Mujcic Australia
Christiane Schroeter United States
Joshua A. Price United States
Frédéric Martinez France
Jooyoung Park South Korea
Andriy Ivchenko United Kingdom
Emma Pleeging Netherlands
Grant E. Donnelly relative to Laurens van Gestel Netherlands Laurens van Gestel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Laurens van Gestel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grant E. Donnelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grant E. Donnelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grant E. Donnelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grant E. Donnelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grant E. Donnelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grant E. Donnelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grant E. Donnelly. The network helps show where Grant E. Donnelly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grant E. Donnelly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grant E. Donnelly Line = papers co-authored together Grant E. Donnelly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201892
2 201641
3 201720
4 201819
5 202115
6 202115
7 202014
8 202213
9 202012
10 202110
11 20234
12 20214
13 20214
14 20242
15 20202
16 20242
17 20231
18 20251
19 20241
20
Voting For Charity: the Benefits For Firms of Direct Consumer Involvement in Charitable Campaigns
20160

About Grant E. Donnelly

Grant E. Donnelly is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Marketing, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 22 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (5 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (56 citations), General Decision Sciences (18 citations), Marketing (67 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (42 citations) and Social Psychology (54 citations). Grant E. Donnelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Leslie K. John, Laura Y. Zatz, Dan Svirsky, Michael I. Norton, Ashley V. Whillans, Rebecca Walker Reczek, Cait Lamberton, Christina A. Roberto, Nicole D. Sintov and Emily Haisley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Psychology, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, Psychological Science, Journal of Consumer Psychology and Journal of Marketing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact