This map shows the geographic impact of Glenn Ballard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenn Ballard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenn Ballard more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenn Ballard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenn Ballard. The network helps show where Glenn Ballard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glenn Ballard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glenn Ballard.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glenn Ballard based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Glenn Ballard. Glenn Ballard is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pikas, Ergo, et al.. (2016). Collaboration in Design – Justification, Characteristics and Related Concepts. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).5 indexed citations
6.
Tillmann, Patrícia, et al.. (2014). Developing a Production System on IPD: Considerations for a Pluralistic Environment. 317–328.6 indexed citations
7.
Arroyo, Paz, Glenn Ballard, & Iris D. Tommelein. (2014). Choosing By Advantages and Rhetoric in Building Design: Relationship and Potential Synergies. 391–408.9 indexed citations
8.
Tillmann, Patrícia, Glenn Ballard, & Iris D. Tommelein. (2014). A Mentoring Approach to Implement Lean Construction. 1283–1293.8 indexed citations
9.
Chen, Chao, et al.. (2014). Target Value Design as a Method for Controlling Project Cost Overruns. 171–181.22 indexed citations
10.
Arroyo, Paz, Iris D. Tommelein, & Glenn Ballard. (2014). Comparing Weighting Rating and Calculating vs. Choosing by Advantages to Make Design Choices. 401–412.18 indexed citations
11.
Ballard, Glenn, et al.. (2014). Are Tools and Training Enough - An Argument for Leadership. 1357–1368.3 indexed citations
Ballard, Glenn. (2012). Should Project Budgets Be Based on Worth or Cost.15 indexed citations
14.
Tillmann, Patrícia, et al.. (2012). How integrated governance contributes to value generation : insights from an IPD case study. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).11 indexed citations
15.
Ballard, Glenn. (2012). TARGET VALUE DESIGN. 11–22.9 indexed citations
16.
Arroyo, Paz, Iris D. Tommelein, & Glenn Ballard. (2012). Deciding a Sustainable Alternative by Choosing by Advantages' in the AEC industry.22 indexed citations
17.
Ballard, Glenn, et al.. (2002). A knowledge management framework for project definition. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 7(13). 197–212.32 indexed citations
18.
Gil, Nuno & Glenn Ballard. (2001). Leveraging Specialty Contractor Knowledge in Design. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management.6 indexed citations
19.
Ballard, Glenn & G. Howell. (1997). Shielding Production from Uncertainty. 126–133.1 indexed citations
20.
Ballard, Glenn, et al.. (1994). Redesigning Job Site Planning Systems. Computing in Civil Engineering. 1564–1574.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.