Gerhard J. Hanneman
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- George A. BarnettMelvin J. VoigtFranklin J. BosterBrenda DervinWilliam D. RichardsWilliam J. McEwenPaul GrayJack M. Nilles
- Topics
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers)Transportation Planning and Optimization (2 papers)Transportation and Mobility Innovations (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Gerhard J. Hanneman
18 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Sociology and Political Science 199
- Communication 114
- Social Psychology 94
- Literature and Literary Theory 73
- Information Systems 51
Countries citing papers authored by Gerhard J. Hanneman
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerhard J. Hanneman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerhard J. Hanneman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerhard J. Hanneman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gerhard J. Hanneman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerhard J. Hanneman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerhard J. Hanneman. The network helps show where Gerhard J. Hanneman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerhard J. Hanneman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerhard J. Hanneman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerhard J. Hanneman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gerhard J. Hanneman. Gerhard J. Hanneman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Media and Society | 2 |
| 2 | Progress in Communication Sciences | 307 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS-TRANSPORTATION TRADEOFFS | 11 |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | Dissemination of Drug Related Information. Drug Abuse Information Research Project. | 1 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | SÏNDI 1: Simulation of information diffusion in a peasant community. | 2 |
| 18 | Racial Attitudes and the Impact of TV Blacks. | 6 |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Gerhard J. Hanneman
Gerhard J. Hanneman is a scholar working on Transportation, Applied Psychology and Automotive Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (2 papers) and Transportation and Mobility Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (114 citations), Library and Information Sciences (11 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (73 citations). Gerhard J. Hanneman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George A. Barnett, Melvin J. Voigt, Franklin J. Boster, Brenda Dervin, William D. Richards, William J. McEwen, Paul Gray, Jack M. Nilles, Bradley S. Greenberg and James A. Danowski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Public Opinion Quarterly and American Behavioral Scientist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.