Ciaran B. Trace

863 total citations · 1 hit paper
32 papers, 521 citations indexed

About

Ciaran B. Trace is a scholar working on Conservation, Information Systems and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Ciaran B. Trace has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 521 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Conservation, 11 papers in Information Systems and 5 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Ciaran B. Trace's work include Digital and Traditional Archives Management (16 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (4 papers). Ciaran B. Trace is often cited by papers focused on Digital and Traditional Archives Management (16 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (4 papers). Ciaran B. Trace collaborates with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Ciaran B. Trace's co-authors include Yan Zhang, Jacek Gwizdka, Yalin Sun, Charlotte P. Lee, Andrew Dillon, Yan Zhang, Yan Zhang, Yan Zhang, Anne J. Gilliland‐Swetland and Richard Marciano and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Information Communication & Society and Journal of Documentation.

In The Last Decade

Ciaran B. Trace

29 papers receiving 479 citations

Hit Papers

Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Infor... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ciaran B. Trace United States 9 180 136 96 95 81 32 521
Kim Martin Canada 9 164 0.9× 44 0.3× 87 0.9× 16 0.2× 27 0.3× 26 531
Elizabeth Buchanan United States 14 244 1.4× 62 0.5× 74 0.8× 14 0.1× 47 0.6× 53 658
Lisl Zach United States 11 270 1.5× 128 0.9× 126 1.3× 14 0.1× 38 0.5× 24 707
Danielle Allard Canada 9 181 1.0× 58 0.4× 84 0.9× 16 0.2× 13 0.2× 33 512
Eleanor Lockley United Kingdom 8 174 1.0× 78 0.6× 49 0.5× 8 0.1× 11 0.1× 13 443
Rebekah Willson Canada 12 117 0.7× 36 0.3× 136 1.4× 11 0.1× 7 0.1× 39 426
Alison Hicks United Kingdom 14 143 0.8× 40 0.3× 151 1.6× 7 0.1× 9 0.1× 67 523
Nicole A. Cooke United States 13 293 1.6× 27 0.2× 163 1.7× 12 0.1× 14 0.2× 61 771
Susan Hansen Australia 10 129 0.7× 38 0.3× 87 0.9× 7 0.1× 24 0.3× 31 425
Kathryn Zickuhr 9 248 1.4× 48 0.4× 135 1.4× 3 0.0× 29 0.4× 10 614

Countries citing papers authored by Ciaran B. Trace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ciaran B. Trace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ciaran B. Trace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ciaran B. Trace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ciaran B. Trace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ciaran B. Trace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ciaran B. Trace. The network helps show where Ciaran B. Trace may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ciaran B. Trace

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ciaran B. Trace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ciaran B. Trace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ciaran B. Trace. Ciaran B. Trace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Trace, Ciaran B., et al.. (2023). Information practices around genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(11). 1265–1281. 1 indexed citations
2.
Trace, Ciaran B. & James A. Hodges. (2023). Algorithmic futures: the intersection of algorithms and evidentiary work. Information Communication & Society. 27(7). 1334–1350.
3.
Hodges, James A. & Ciaran B. Trace. (2023). Preserving algorithmic systems: a synthesis of overlapping approaches, materialities and contexts. Journal of Documentation. 79(6). 1380–1392. 1 indexed citations
4.
Trace, Ciaran B.. (2021). Archival infrastructure and the information backlog. PubMed. 22(1). 75–93. 4 indexed citations
5.
Zhang, Yan & Ciaran B. Trace. (2021). The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(6). 879–891. 4 indexed citations
7.
Trace, Ciaran B.. (2020). Maintaining Records in Context: A Historical Exploration of the Theory and Practice of Archival Classification and Arrangement. The American Archivist. 83(1). 91–127. 4 indexed citations
8.
Trace, Ciaran B.. (2020). Maintaining Records in Context? Disrupting the Theory and Practice of Archival Classification and Arrangement. The American Archivist. 83(2). 322–372. 4 indexed citations
9.
Sun, Yalin, Yan Zhang, Jacek Gwizdka, & Ciaran B. Trace. (2019). Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(5). e12522–e12522. 200 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Trace, Ciaran B., et al.. (2017). Data ecosystem in self‐tracking health and wellness apps. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 54(1). 816–818. 2 indexed citations
11.
Trace, Ciaran B., et al.. (2016). Information management in the humanities: Scholarly processes, tools, and the construction of personal collections. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2). 491–507. 41 indexed citations
12.
Trace, Ciaran B.. (2015). Ethnomethodology. Journal of Documentation. 72(1). 47–64. 13 indexed citations
13.
Trace, Ciaran B., et al.. (2015). The value and complexity of collection arrangement for evidentiary work. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(9). 1857–1882. 5 indexed citations
14.
Trace, Ciaran B., et al.. (2014). Encoded Archival Description: Data Quality and Analysis. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 51(1). 1–10. 4 indexed citations
15.
Trace, Ciaran B. & Andrew Dillon. (2012). The evolution of the finding aid in the United States: from physical to digital document genre. Archives and Museum Informatics. 12(4). 501–519. 11 indexed citations
16.
Trace, Ciaran B.. (2011). Beyond the Magic to the Mechanism: Computers, Materiality, and What It Means for Records to Be “Born Digital”. Archivaria. 72(72). 5–27. 4 indexed citations
17.
Trace, Ciaran B.. (2007). Information creation and the notion of membership. Journal of Documentation. 63(1). 142–164. 52 indexed citations
18.
Trace, Ciaran B.. (2006). For love of the game: an ethnographic analysis of archival reference work.. 34(1). 124. 7 indexed citations
19.
Gilliland‐Swetland, Anne J., et al.. (2002). InterPARES 2: Experiential, interactive, and dynamic records. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 39(1). 465–465. 6 indexed citations
20.
Trace, Ciaran B., et al.. (2000). InterPARES: Securing the Future of Our Electronic Records. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 27(1). 24–26. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026