William Paisley
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Milton ChenEdwin B. ParkerSuzanne PingreeRobert P. HawkinsRonald E. RicePhilip J. StoneJack LevinOle R. Holsti
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (3 papers)Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (3 papers)Media Studies and Communication (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Paisley
40 papers receiving 479 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Sociology and Political Science 162
- Gender Studies 154
- Education 103
- Communication 91
- Information Systems 77
Countries citing papers authored by William Paisley
This map shows the geographic impact of William Paisley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Paisley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Paisley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Paisley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Paisley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Paisley. The network helps show where William Paisley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Paisley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Paisley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Paisley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Paisley. William Paisley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | The First Wave: CD-ROM Adoption in Offices and Libraries. | 1 |
| 6 | Children and MicroComputers | 30 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Knowledge utilization systems in education : dissemination, technical assistance, networking | 8 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | Improving an "ERIC-Like" Information System. | 1 |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | Perspectives on the Utilization of Knowledge. | 1 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | The Flow of (Behavioral) Science Information: A Review of the Research Literature. | 34 |
| 19 | Extent of information-seeking as a function of subjective certainty and the utility of the information | 1 |
| 20 | 16 |
About William Paisley
William Paisley is a scholar working on Communication, General Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 46 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (3 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (31 citations), Gender Studies (154 citations) and Communication (91 citations). William Paisley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Milton Chen, Edwin B. Parker, Suzanne Pingree, Robert P. Hawkins, Ronald E. Rice, Philip J. Stone, Jack Levin, Ole R. Holsti, George Gerbner and Klaus Krippendorff. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, American Sociological Review and Medical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.