D.K.B. Nias

35 papers receiving 977 citations

Peers

D.K.B. Nias
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Applied Psychology 113
  • Social Psychology 404
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 236
  • Clinical Psychology 299
  • Marketing 120
Replace Joel Aronoff with:
Joel Aronoff United States
Ronald N. Bond United States
Marshall Dermer United States
K. T. Strongman New Zealand
Philip J. Corr
Victor Bissonnette United States
Brenda N. Buswell United States
Thomas J. Liu United States
Nerella V. Ramanaiah United States
A. Chris Downs United States
D.K.B. Nias relative to Joel Aronoff United States Joel Aronoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joel Aronoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D.K.B. Nias

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.K.B. Nias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.K.B. Nias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.K.B. Nias more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.K.B. Nias

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.K.B. Nias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.K.B. Nias. The network helps show where D.K.B. Nias may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D.K.B. Nias, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D.K.B. Nias Line = papers co-authored together D.K.B. Nias links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986284
2 1982167
3 1985125
4 199692
5
Sex, Violence and the Media
197866
6 198161
7 197142
8 199639
9
Astrology: Science or Superstition?
198234
10 198927
11 198317
12 197216
13 198316
14 198415
15 197212
16 197411
17 197711
18 197611
19 197611
20 198310

About D.K.B. Nias

D.K.B. Nias is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (113 citations), Social Psychology (404 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (236 citations), Clinical Psychology (299 citations) and Marketing (120 citations). D.K.B. Nias has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include H. J. Eysenck, Michael C. Neale, David W. Fulker, J. Philippe Rushton, David N. Cox, Peter D. White, Sybil B. G. Eysenck, M. B. Shapiro, George D. Wilson and Karl Otto Götz. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Behaviour Research and Therapy, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and The Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact