Kim Martin
- Demography top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Communication top 10%
- Co-authors
- Anabel Quan‐HaaseKathleen SchreursLori McCay‐PeetFrances GaysRupert KenefeckColin G. BrooksNadine DesrochersLouise F. Spiteri
- Topics
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship (9 papers)Web Data Mining and Analysis (5 papers)Digital and Traditional Archives Management (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of ImmunologyInformation Communication & Society
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kim Martin
23 papers receiving 498 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Demography 206
- Sociology and Political Science 164
- Information Systems 87
- Information Systems and Management 79
- Communication 57
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Martin
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Martin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Martin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Martin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Martin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Martin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Martin. The network helps show where Kim Martin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Martin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Martin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Martin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Martin. Kim Martin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 178 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | STAK - Serendipitous Tool for Augmenting Knowledge: Bridging Gaps between Digital and Physical Resources. | 1 |
| 12 | Not All on the Same Page: E-Book Adoption and Technology Exploration by Seniors. | 22 |
| 13 | Designing the next big thing: Randomness versus serendipity in DH tools. | 1 |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 37 |
About Kim Martin
Kim Martin is a scholar working on Conservation, Literature and Literary Theory and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 26 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (9 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (5 papers) and Digital and Traditional Archives Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (41 citations), Demography (206 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (23 citations). Kim Martin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anabel Quan‐Haase, Kathleen Schreurs, Lori McCay‐Peet, Frances Gays, Rupert Kenefeck, Colin G. Brooks, Nadine Desrochers, Louise F. Spiteri, Susan Brown and Diane Rasmussen Pennington. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Immunology and Information Communication & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.