Gemma Stacey

1.2k citations
54 papers · 743 indexed · h-index 17

Gemma Stacey

50 papers receiving 707 citations

Peers

Gemma Stacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Research and Theory 115
  • General Health Professions 397
  • Leadership and Management 18
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 63
Replace Wanda M. Chernomas with:
Wanda M. Chernomas Canada
Trish Martin Australia
Rosie Stenhouse United Kingdom
William K. Cody United States
Steven L. Baumann United States
Philip Warelow Australia
Jenny Spouse United Kingdom
Jasna Schwind Canada
Rochelle Einboden Australia
Justin Andrews Canada
Gemma Stacey relative to Wanda M. Chernomas Canada Wanda M. Chernomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Wanda M. Chernomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Stacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Stacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Stacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Stacey. The network helps show where Gemma Stacey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Stacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Stacey Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Stacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20242
3 20231
4 20222
5 20217
6 20211
7 202030
8 20192
9 201925
10 20176
11 20177
12 201634
13 201628
14 201518
15 201515
16 201212
17 20117
18 20113
19 201080
20 200944

About Gemma Stacey

Gemma Stacey is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, General Health Professions, Family Practice and Public Administration, having authored 54 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (15 papers), Nursing education and management (11 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (8 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (115 citations), General Health Professions (397 citations), Leadership and Management (18 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (63 citations). Gemma Stacey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Theodore Stickley, Pip Hardy, Aimée Aubeeluck, Anne Felton, Kristian Pollock, Mark Pearson, Paul Crawford, Nicola Wright, Edward J. N. Stupple and Karen Harrison Dening. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nurse Education in Practice, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Journal of research in nursing and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026