Mark Pearson

468 total citations
21 papers, 175 citations indexed

About

Mark Pearson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Pearson has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 175 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Mark Pearson's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). Mark Pearson is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). Mark Pearson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Norway. Mark Pearson's co-authors include Anne Cutler, Geoffrey Beattie, Gemma Stacey, C. J. Darwin, Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone, Tim Carter, Paul Crawford, Prerna Singh, Gary Winship and Ada Hui and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, PLoS ONE and Speech Communication.

In The Last Decade

Mark Pearson

18 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Pearson United Kingdom 8 52 44 41 27 22 21 175
Danielle Jones United Kingdom 7 76 1.5× 29 0.7× 78 1.9× 27 1.0× 96 4.4× 13 238
Christopher Elsey United Kingdom 7 70 1.3× 16 0.4× 48 1.2× 18 0.7× 74 3.4× 11 233
Anne Marie Dalby Landmark Norway 8 143 2.8× 23 0.5× 111 2.7× 26 1.0× 24 1.1× 18 235
Marianne Lind Norway 11 85 1.6× 39 0.9× 39 1.0× 15 0.6× 23 1.0× 21 281
İlknur Maviş Türkiye 8 16 0.3× 34 0.8× 25 0.6× 37 1.4× 24 1.1× 31 243
Lena G. Caesar United States 8 51 1.0× 34 0.8× 35 0.9× 117 4.3× 4 0.2× 13 314
Gerard Lynch Ireland 7 32 0.6× 27 0.6× 11 0.3× 56 2.1× 122 5.5× 15 239
Shannon Dailey United States 5 7 0.1× 44 1.0× 23 0.6× 62 2.3× 3 0.1× 6 224
Thure von Uexküll Germany 11 30 0.6× 20 0.5× 13 0.3× 39 1.4× 31 1.4× 40 287
Arthur H. Schwartz United States 10 17 0.3× 24 0.5× 25 0.6× 102 3.8× 25 1.1× 31 236

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pearson. The network helps show where Mark Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Pearson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Pearson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Pearson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Pearson. Mark Pearson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pearson, Mark & Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone. (2025). An Exploration of Online Positive Feedback in Relation to Mental Health Nursing Practice. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 34(4). e70116–e70116. 1 indexed citations
2.
Pearson, Mark. (2025). The Potential of Poetry in Mental Health Nurse Pre‐registration Education. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 34(1). e13509–e13509.
3.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2024). “It's really important work…and celebrating that, I think, is really important” – co‐produced qualitative research into future of mental health nurse education. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 33(6). 2071–2079. 2 indexed citations
4.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2024). Surviving by storytelling – a research through design exploration of online poetry and mental health workshops. Journal of Poetry Therapy. 38(2). 75–87. 1 indexed citations
5.
Pearson, Mark. (2024). The Poetic Wavelength—Tuning into the Meaningful Poetics of Psychosis. Journal of Medical Humanities. 46(4). 729–736. 1 indexed citations
6.
Evans, Kerry, Ada Hui, Mark Pearson, et al.. (2023). Health service improvement using positive patient feedback: Systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE. 18(10). e0275045–e0275045. 8 indexed citations
7.
Pearson, Mark, Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone, & Gary Winship. (2023). The biological paradigm of psychosis in crisis: A Kuhnian analysis. Nursing Philosophy. 24(4). e12418–e12418. 3 indexed citations
8.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2023). Tattoos as symbols – an exploration of the relationship between tattoos and mental health. The Journal of Mental Health Training Education and Practice. 18(3). 217–227. 4 indexed citations
9.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2022). Creative Long Covid: A qualitative exploration of the experience of Long Covid through the medium of creative narratives. Health Expectations. 25(6). 2950–2959. 12 indexed citations
10.
Pearson, Mark, Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone, & Gary Winship. (2022). The poetic wavelength – a narrative interview study exploring the potential of poetry to support meaning making and recovery following psychosis. Psychosis. 16(1). 40–51. 3 indexed citations
11.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2021). Open dialogue and co-production: promoting a dialogical practice culture in the co-production of teaching and learning within nurse education. The Journal of Mental Health Training Education and Practice. 16(5). 364–372.
12.
13.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2020). How Can Poetry Support the Understanding of Psychotic Experiences? - A Conceptual Review.. PubMed. 3(1). 39–53. 7 indexed citations
14.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2020). A qualitative study of service users’ experiences of mental health nurses’ knowledge and skills in relation to medication. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 28(4). 682–691. 5 indexed citations
15.
Stacey, Gemma & Mark Pearson. (2019). An inductive content analysis of formative feedback given by lived experience assessors in pre-registration mental health nurse education. The Journal of Mental Health Training Education and Practice. 15(1). 33–42. 2 indexed citations
16.
Stacey, Gemma & Mark Pearson. (2018). Exploring the influence of feedback given by people with lived experience of mental distress on learning for preregistration mental health students. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 25(5-6). 23 indexed citations
17.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (2017). Backing up digital preservation practice with empirical research. Alexandria The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues. 27(2). 66–82. 1 indexed citations
18.
Darwin, C. J. & Mark Pearson. (1982). What tells us when voicing has started?. Speech Communication. 1(1). 29–44. 8 indexed citations
19.
Beattie, Geoffrey, Anne Cutler, & Mark Pearson. (1982). Why is Mrs Thatcher interrupted so often?. Nature. 300(5894). 744–747. 62 indexed citations
20.
Pearson, Mark, et al.. (1980). An introduction to a sample time-series of abyssal macrobenthos - methods and principle sources of variability. Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea). 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Danielle Jones Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christopher Elsey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne Marie Dalby Landmark Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marianne Lind Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by İlknur Maviş Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lena G. Caesar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gerard Lynch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shannon Dailey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thure von Uexküll Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Arthur H. Schwartz
Rankless by CCL
2026