G.C. Mead
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.1%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 38
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 29
- Food Science top 0.1%
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 53
- Food Safety and Hygiene 26
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods 16
- Biotechnology top 0.2%
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 26
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research 13
-
- Identification and Quantification in Food 14
- Co-authors
- J. A. HintonB. W. AdamsElla M. BarnesW R HudsonS. NotermansC. S. ImpeyI. ChopraChristina A. Cherrington
- Journals
- British Poultry Science (23 papers)Letters in Applied Microbiology (12 papers)International Journal of Food Microbiology (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
G.C. Mead
128 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Animal Science and Zoology 1.8k
- Food Science 2.8k
- Biotechnology 1.1k
- Endocrinology 236
- Infectious Diseases 706
Countries citing papers authored by G.C. Mead
This map shows the geographic impact of G.C. Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.C. Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.C. Mead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G.C. Mead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.C. Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.C. Mead. The network helps show where G.C. Mead may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.C. Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 158 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 202 | |
| 9 | Microbial Control in the Meat Industry | 1997 | 3 |
| 10 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 11 | Problems of producing safe poultry: discussion paper. | 1993 | 30 |
| 12 | 1993 | 47 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 30 | |
| 15 | 1989 | 48 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 102 | |
| 19 | Recommendation for a standardized method of sensory analysis for broilers | 1987 | 10 |
| 20 | 1987 | 27 |
About G.C. Mead
G.C. Mead is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science and Biotechnology, having authored 129 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (53 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (38 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (29 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (26 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (26 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (16 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (14 papers) and Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (1.8k citations), Food Science (2.8k citations) and Biotechnology (1.1k citations). G.C. Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Hinton, B. W. Adams, Ella M. Barnes, W R Hudson, S. Notermans, C. S. Impey, I. Chopra, Christina A. Cherrington, T. J. Humphrey and E.G. Harry. Their work appears in journals such as British Poultry Science, Letters in Applied Microbiology, International Journal of Food Microbiology, Food Microbiology and World s Poultry Science Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.