G.C. Mead

6.1k total citations
129 papers, 4.3k citations indexed

About

G.C. Mead is a scholar working on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Biotechnology. According to data from OpenAlex, G.C. Mead has authored 129 papers receiving a total of 4.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 79 papers in Food Science, 57 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 30 papers in Biotechnology. Recurrent topics in G.C. Mead's work include Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (53 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (38 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (29 papers). G.C. Mead is often cited by papers focused on Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (53 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (38 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (29 papers). G.C. Mead collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. G.C. Mead's co-authors include J. A. Hinton, B. W. Adams, Ella M. Barnes, W R Hudson, S. Notermans, C. S. Impey, Christina A. Cherrington, I. Chopra, T. J. Humphrey and E.G. Harry and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and International Journal of Food Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

G.C. Mead

128 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
G.C. Mead United Kingdom	36	2.8k	1.8k	1.1k	848	706	129	4.3k
J.S. Bailey United States	40	3.6k 1.3×	2.4k 1.3×	1.5k 1.3×	548 0.6×	902 1.3×	172	5.1k
Janet E.L. Corry United Kingdom	33	2.5k 0.9×	740 0.4×	1.2k 1.1×	821 1.0×	693 1.0×	87	3.8k
Winy Messens Belgium	38	3.1k 1.1×	1.3k 0.7×	1.1k 1.0×	899 1.1×	619 0.9×	100	4.3k
Lieve Herman Belgium	36	2.4k 0.9×	1.2k 0.7×	980 0.9×	818 1.0×	483 0.7×	85	3.9k
M.E. Berrang United States	39	3.2k 1.2×	1.5k 0.8×	1.8k 1.6×	634 0.7×	684 1.0×	174	4.4k
Gregory R. Siragusa United States	40	2.7k 1.0×	1.7k 0.9×	1.5k 1.3×	1.2k 1.4×	878 1.2×	127	5.2k
D. À. A. Mossel Netherlands	35	2.6k 0.9×	794 0.4×	1.6k 1.4×	1.1k 1.3×	490 0.7×	198	4.7k
Michael E. Hume United States	39	2.1k 0.8×	1.6k 0.9×	526 0.5×	949 1.1×	977 1.4×	179	4.9k
Paul Gibbs Portugal	39	3.1k 1.1×	758 0.4×	1.5k 1.3×	1.6k 1.9×	659 0.9×	129	5.1k
N.A. Cox United States	45	5.1k 1.9×	3.6k 2.0×	2.0k 1.8×	1.1k 1.3×	1.3k 1.9×	265	7.4k

Countries citing papers authored by G.C. Mead

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.C. Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.C. Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.C. Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.C. Mead

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.C. Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.C. Mead. The network helps show where G.C. Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.C. Mead

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.C. Mead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.C. Mead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.C. Mead. G.C. Mead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hutchison, M.L., L.D. Walters, V.M. Allen, G.C. Mead, & M. Howell. (2006). Measurement of Campylobacter Numbers on Carcasses in British Poultry Slaughterhouses. Journal of Food Protection. 69(2). 421–424. 6 indexed citations

Mead, G.C.. (2005). Food Safety Control in the Poultry Industry. 33 indexed citations

Cardinale, Éric, F. Tall, M.F. Cissé, et al.. (2005). Risk factors associated withSalmonella entericasubsp.entericacontamination of chicken carcases in Senegal. British Poultry Science. 46(3). 293–299. 8 indexed citations

Mead, G.C., V.M. Allen, C.H. Burton, & Janet E.L. Corry. (2000). Microbial cross-contamination during air chilling of poultry. British Poultry Science. 41(2). 158–162. 32 indexed citations

Edwards, David S., K. H. Christiansen, A.M. Johnston, & G.C. Mead. (1999). Determination of farm-level risk factors for abnormalities observed during post-mortem meat inspection of lambs: a feasibility study. Epidemiology and Infection. 123(1). 109–119. 15 indexed citations

Hinton, J. A., G.C. Mead, Miguel A. Asensio, et al.. (1997). Microbial Control in the Meat Industry. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 3 indexed citations

Mead, G.C.. (1997). Application of HACCP Principles in the Meat Industry: A United Kingdom Perspective. Acta Veterinaria Brno. 66(2). 117–125. 4 indexed citations

Mead, G.C.. (1993). Problems of producing safe poultry: discussion paper.. PubMed. 86(1). 39–42. 30 indexed citations

Mead, G.C., W R Hudson, & J. A. Hinton. (1993). Microbiological survey of five poultry processing plants in the UK. British Poultry Science. 34(3). 497–503. 47 indexed citations

10.

Notermans, S., J. A. M. A. Dormans, & G.C. Mead. (1991). Contribution of surface attachment to the establishment of micro‐organisms in food processing plants: A review. Biofouling. 5(1-2). 21–36. 67 indexed citations

11.

Mackey, B.M., et al.. (1990). Heat resistance of Listeria: strain differences and effects of meat type and curing salts. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 10(6). 251–255. 65 indexed citations

12.

Humphrey, T. J., G.C. Mead, & B. Rowe. (1988). Poultry meat as a source of human salmonellosis in England and Wales. Epidemiology and Infection. 100(2). 175–184. 102 indexed citations

13.

Mead, G.C.. (1987). Recommendation for a standardized method of sensory analysis for broilers. World s Poultry Science Journal. 43(1). 64–68. 10 indexed citations

14.

Dodd, Christine E. R., B. W. Adams, G.C. Mead, & W.M. Waites. (1987). Use of plasmid profiles to detect changes in strains of Staphylococcus aureus during poultry processing. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 63(5). 417–425. 4 indexed citations

15.

Hudson, W R, et al.. (1987). 'Nurmi concept' and possible transmission of campylobacters to poultry. Veterinary Record. 120(18). 439–439. 1 indexed citations

16.

Dodd, Christine E. R., B. W. Adams, G.C. Mead, & W.M. Waites. (1987). Use of plasmid profiles to detect changes in strains of Staphylococcus aureus during poultry processing. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 63(5). 417–425. 18 indexed citations

17.

Hudson, W R & G.C. Mead. (1987). Factors affecting the survival of Campylobacter jejuni in relation to immersion scalding of poultry. Veterinary Record. 121(10). 225–227. 8 indexed citations

18.

Barnes, Ella M., G.C. Mead, & Nerys M. Griffiths. (1973). The microbiology and sensory evaluation of pheasants hung at 5, 10 and 15 °C. British Poultry Science. 14(3). 229–240. 16 indexed citations

19.

Mead, G.C.. (1969). Combined Effect of Salt Concentration and Redox Potential of the Medium on the Initiation of Vegetative Growth by Clostridium welchii. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 32(4). 468–475. 15 indexed citations

20.

Mead, G.C.. (1963). A Medium for the Isolation of Streptococcus faecalis, sensu strictu. Nature. 197(4874). 1323–1324. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact