Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Agility in responding to disruptive digital innovation: Case study of an SME
2018236 citationsCalvin M. L. Chan, Say Yen Teoh et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Gary Pan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary Pan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary Pan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary Pan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary Pan. The network helps show where Gary Pan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gary Pan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gary Pan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gary Pan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gary Pan. Gary Pan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kusnadi, Yuanto & Gary Pan. (2020). Developing online business strategy with millennials through partnership with university. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University).1 indexed citations
4.
Pan, Gary, et al.. (2019). Charting the future of accountancy with AI. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University).8 indexed citations
5.
Seow, Poh Sun & Gary Pan. (2018). Teaching internal control using a student-generated video project. Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University). 12(1). 64–72.2 indexed citations
6.
Pan, Gary. (2017). A dominant logic view of managing IT innovation. Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University). 28(4). 1–17.2 indexed citations
7.
Seow, Poh Sun, Gary Pan, & Themin Suwardy. (2016). Data Mining Journal Entries for Fraud Detection: A Replication of Debreceny and Gray's (2010) Techniques. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 8(3). 501–514.4 indexed citations
8.
Teoh, Say Yen, Calvin M. L. Chan, Gary Pan, & Mark Goh. (2016). BEING AGILE TO THRIVE AMIDST DISRUPTIVE DIGITAL INNOVATIONS. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 1–8.1 indexed citations
Pan, Gary & Shan L. Pan. (2011). Transition to is Project De-Escalation: An Exploration into Management Executive's Influence Behaviours. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
11.
Pan, Gary, Poh Sun Seow, & Themin Suwardy. (2011). Fraud: A Review and Research Agenda. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10. 138–178.6 indexed citations
12.
Pan, Gary, Shan L. Pan, & Michael Newman. (2009). Managing Information Technology Project Escalation and De-Escalation: An Approach-Avoidance Perspective. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University).
13.
Pan, Gary, Ray Hackney, & Shan L. Pan. (2008). Information Systems Implementation Failure: Insights from Prism. SSRN Electronic Journal.
14.
Pan, Gary & Shan L. Pan. (2006). Examining the Coalition Dynamics in Affecting IS Project Abandonment Decision-Making. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
15.
Pan, Gary. (2006). The Hidden Dilemmas in Software Development Project Decision- making: Persist or Desist?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 92.2 indexed citations
16.
Pan, Gary, Shan L. Pan, Michael Newman, & Donal Flynn. (2006). Escalation and De-Escalation of Commitment to Information Technology Projects: A Commitment Transformation Analysis of an E-Government Project. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Pan, Shan L., Gary Pan, & Ming‐Huei Hsieh. (2006). A Dual-Level Analysis of Capability Development Process: A Case Study of TTNT. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
18.
Pan, Gary. (2005). Information Systems Project Abandonment: A Stakeholder Analysis. Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University).3 indexed citations
19.
Pan, Shan L., Gary Pan, & Paul Devadoss. (2005). E-Government Capabilities and Crisis Management: Lessons from Combating SARS in Singapore. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 4(4). 385–397.25 indexed citations
20.
Pan, Gary, Shan L. Pan, Michael Newman, & Donal Flynn. (2004). 'Unfreezing-Changing-Refreezing' of Actors' Commitment: The Transition from Escalation to De-Escalation of Commitment to Information Technology Projects. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1476–1487.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.