Friedrich M. Götz
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Surgery
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Peter J. RentfrowSamuel D. GoslingTobias EbertStefan StiegerUlf‐Dietrich ReipsJon JachimowiczAdam D. GalinskyJeff Potter
- Topics
- Cultural Differences and Values (12 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers)
- Journals
- NatureProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Friedrich M. Götz
51 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Sociology and Political Science 390
- Social Psychology 368
- Clinical Psychology 279
- Surgery 243
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 211
Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich M. Götz
This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich M. Götz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich M. Götz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich M. Götz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich M. Götz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich M. Götz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich M. Götz. The network helps show where Friedrich M. Götz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friedrich M. Götz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friedrich M. Götz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friedrich M. Götz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friedrich M. Götz. Friedrich M. Götz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | The Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST): A psychometrically validated measure of news veracity discernmentbreakdown → | 52 |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 65 | |
| 12 | Small Effects: The Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Sciencebreakdown → | 294 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 58 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 85 | |
| 20 | 88 |
About Friedrich M. Götz
Friedrich M. Götz is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (12 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (143 citations), Emergency Medicine (196 citations) and Social Psychology (368 citations). Friedrich M. Götz has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Rentfrow, Samuel D. Gosling, Tobias Ebert, Stefan Stieger, Ulf‐Dietrich Reips, Jon Jachimowicz, Adam D. Galinsky, Jeff Potter, Rakoen Maertens and Susanne Buecker. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.