Jennifer Dykema
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 5
- Health top 10%
- Health disparities and outcomes 8
-
- Survey Methodology and Nonresponse 28
- Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods 8
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 6
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 3
- Gender Studies top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
-
- Healthcare Policy and Management 5
-
- Healthcare Systems and Technology 3
- Co-authors
- Nora Cate SchaefferJohn StevensonDana GarbarskiNathan R. JonesYujin KimD. Paul MobergChristopher PetersonJason A. Bleedorn
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (3 papers)American Sociological Review (2 papers)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Jennifer Dykema
47 papers receiving 971 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Applied Psychology 101
- Health 92
- Sociology and Political Science 393
- Gender Studies 78
- General Health Professions 200
Countries citing papers authored by Jennifer Dykema
This map shows the geographic impact of Jennifer Dykema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jennifer Dykema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jennifer Dykema more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jennifer Dykema
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jennifer Dykema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jennifer Dykema. The network helps show where Jennifer Dykema may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jennifer Dykema, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 162 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 16 | Response Scales and the Measurement of Racial Attitudes: Agree-Disagree Versus Item Specific Formats | 2013 | 2 |
| 17 | 2011 | 71 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 57 |
About Jennifer Dykema
Jennifer Dykema is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (28 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (8 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (101 citations), Health (92 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (393 citations). Jennifer Dykema has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Nora Cate Schaeffer, John Stevenson, Dana Garbarski, Nathan R. Jones, Yujin Kim, D. Paul Moberg, Christopher Peterson, Jason A. Bleedorn, Robert J. Hardie and Vence L. Bonham. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Sociological Review and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.