Felicity Deamer

414 citations
17 papers · 272 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Felicity Deamer

15 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Felicity Deamer
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 75
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
  • Philosophy 40
  • Language and Linguistics 25
Replace Signy Wegener with:
Signy Wegener Australia
Luca Bischetti Italy
Dalya Samur Netherlands
Chiara Μ. Monzoni United Kingdom
G. Lynn Stephens United States
Elaine Chaika United States
Caroline A. Baker United States
Elisabeth Gülich Germany
Luigi Pastore Italy
Milton J. Dehn United States
Felicity Deamer relative to Signy Wegener Australia Signy Wegener's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Signy Wegener · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felicity Deamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felicity Deamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicity Deamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicity Deamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felicity Deamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicity Deamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicity Deamer. The network helps show where Felicity Deamer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Felicity Deamer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felicity Deamer Line = papers co-authored together Felicity Deamer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201864
2 201855
3 202035
4 201823
5 201517
6 201916
7 201814
8 202213
9 201912
10 20189
11 20225
12 20234
13 20233
14 20231
15 20241
16 20230
17 20210

About Felicity Deamer

Felicity Deamer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Language and Linguistics, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 17 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (2 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (109 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (75 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations), Philosophy (40 citations) and Language and Linguistics (25 citations). Felicity Deamer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Sam Wilkinson, Mark Hayward, Charles Fernyhough, Wolfram Hinzen, Frank Larøi, Neil Thomas, André Alemán, Simon McCarthy‐Jones, Vitor Zimmerer and Emma Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Policing & Society, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Clinical Psychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact