Countries where authors publish in Policing & Society
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Policing & Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Policing & Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Policing & Society more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Policing & Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Policing & Society.
About Policing & Society
The 1.3k papers published in Policing & Society in the last decades have received a total of 21.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Policing & Society usually cover Political Science and International Relations (952 papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.0k papers) and Health (148 papers) specifically the topics of Policing Practices and Perceptions (894 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (631 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (266 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (141 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (82 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (76 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (71 papers) and Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Policing & Society are Wesley G. Skogan, Ben Bradford, Bethan Loftus, Kristina Murphy, Andrew Goldsmith, Benoît Dupont, Maurice Punch, Mike Maguire, Karen Bullock and Jerry H. Ratcliffe.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.