Mar Rus‐Calafell
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Co-authors
- Lucia ValmaggiaPhilippa GaretyJosé Gutiérrez‐MaldonadoMatthew J. KemptonJoan Ribas‐SabatéThomas WardTom CraigRichard Emsley
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (25 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (22 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanySpain
In The Last Decade
Mar Rus‐Calafell
57 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Psychiatry and Mental health 686
- Clinical Psychology 474
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 442
- Applied Psychology 438
- Human-Computer Interaction 391
Countries citing papers authored by Mar Rus‐Calafell
This map shows the geographic impact of Mar Rus‐Calafell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mar Rus‐Calafell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mar Rus‐Calafell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mar Rus‐Calafell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mar Rus‐Calafell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mar Rus‐Calafell. The network helps show where Mar Rus‐Calafell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mar Rus‐Calafell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mar Rus‐Calafell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mar Rus‐Calafell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mar Rus‐Calafell. Mar Rus‐Calafell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Advances in the use of virtual reality to treat mental health conditionsbreakdown → | 44 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 248 | |
| 17 | Virtual reality in the psychological treatment for mental health problems: An systematic review of recent evidencebreakdown → | 326 |
| 18 | 59 | |
| 19 | Social skills training for people with schizophrenia: What do we train? | 15 |
| 20 | 5 |
About Mar Rus‐Calafell
Mar Rus‐Calafell is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Human-Computer Interaction and Applied Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (25 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (22 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (438 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (391 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (686 citations). Mar Rus‐Calafell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Lucia Valmaggia, Philippa Garety, José Gutiérrez‐Maldonado, Matthew J. Kempton, Joan Ribas‐Sabaté, Thomas Ward, Tom Craig, Richard Emsley, Thomas Craig and Mark Huckvale. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Medicine, Psychological Medicine and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.