Leanne Bogen‐Johnston

410 citations
16 papers · 289 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Leanne Bogen‐Johnston

16 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Leanne Bogen‐Johnston
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 93
  • Philosophy 45
  • Applied Psychology 13
  • Clinical Psychology 51
  • General Health Professions 46
Replace Fiona S. Graff with:
Fiona S. Graff United States
Susan Lees United Kingdom
Adam J. Mann United States
Lluís Lalucat-Jo Spain
Anja Munkholm Denmark
Daniel Sutton New Zealand
Hugo Franco United States
Sujata Sethi India
Corinna Hackmann United Kingdom
Maarten van Son Netherlands
Leanne Bogen‐Johnston relative to Fiona S. Graff United States Fiona S. Graff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Fiona S. Graff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leanne Bogen‐Johnston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leanne Bogen‐Johnston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leanne Bogen‐Johnston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leanne Bogen‐Johnston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leanne Bogen‐Johnston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leanne Bogen‐Johnston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leanne Bogen‐Johnston. The network helps show where Leanne Bogen‐Johnston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leanne Bogen‐Johnston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leanne Bogen‐Johnston Line = papers co-authored together Leanne Bogen‐Johnston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2017103
2 202227
3 201323
4 201423
5 201823
6 201720
7 201820
8 202014
9 20238
10 20148
11 20197
12 20115
13 20233
14 20212
15 20242
16 20211

About Leanne Bogen‐Johnston

Leanne Bogen‐Johnston is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers) and Hallucinations in medical conditions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (93 citations), Philosophy (45 citations), Applied Psychology (13 citations), Clinical Psychology (51 citations) and General Health Professions (46 citations). Leanne Bogen‐Johnston has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark Hayward, Clara Strauss, Anna‐Marie Jones, Neil Thomas, Natalie Edelman, Anthony Glasper, Clio Berry, Richard de Visser, Cassie M. Hazell and Felicity Deamer. Their work appears in journals such as BJPsych Open, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Health Psychology, Epidemiology and Infection and Health & Social Care in the Community.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact