Neil Thomas

210 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Peers

Neil Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 3.2k
  • Biological Psychiatry 460
  • Applied Psychology 675
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
Replace Gretchen L. Haas with:
Gretchen L. Haas United States
Sophia Vinogradov United States
Jürgen Gallinat Germany
Thérèse van Amelsvoort Netherlands
Cheryl M. Corcoran United States
Stéphane Potvin Canada
Katherine E. Burdick United States
Susan L. Rossell Australia
Michael A. Rapp Germany
Marie‐Odile Krebs France
Neil Thomas relative to Gretchen L. Haas United States Gretchen L. Haas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Gretchen L. Haas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Thomas. The network helps show where Neil Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Neil Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 219 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010439
2 2012210
3 2014163
4 2014149
5 2019142
6 2008129
7 2017120
8 2017119
9 2011118
10 2000112
11 2020107
12 2014104
13 2005101
14 201799
15 201098
16 201191
17 201489
18 201785
19 201683
20 200181

About Neil Thomas

Neil Thomas is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 219 papers that have together received 7.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (81 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (41 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (32 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (29 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (26 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (20 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (18 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (3.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (460 citations), Applied Psychology (675 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.8k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations). Neil Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Falkai, Susan L. Rossell, Thomas Wobrock, Oliver Gruber, Simon McCarthy‐Jones, John Farhall, Alkomiet Hasan, William G. Honer, Andrea Schmitt and Clara Strauss. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Psychiatry Research, Schizophrenia Research and The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026