Fariss–Terry Mousa
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 0.5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Accounting top 5%
- Business and International Management top 1%
- Co-authors
- William J. WalesVishal K. GuptaRichard ReedWilliam J. RitchieDan MarlinSam Yul ChoSang Kyun KimArvin Sahaym
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers)Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (9 papers)Private Equity and Venture Capital (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Management of Technology and InnovationBusiness and International ManagementOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Fariss–Terry Mousa
15 papers receiving 849 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Management of Technology and Innovation 617
- Strategy and Management 350
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 326
- Accounting 303
- Business and International Management 161
Countries citing papers authored by Fariss–Terry Mousa
This map shows the geographic impact of Fariss–Terry Mousa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fariss–Terry Mousa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fariss–Terry Mousa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fariss–Terry Mousa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fariss–Terry Mousa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fariss–Terry Mousa. The network helps show where Fariss–Terry Mousa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fariss–Terry Mousa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fariss–Terry Mousa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fariss–Terry Mousa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fariss–Terry Mousa. Fariss–Terry Mousa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 52 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future researchbreakdown → | 604 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2 |
About Fariss–Terry Mousa
Fariss–Terry Mousa is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 884 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (9 papers) and Private Equity and Venture Capital (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (617 citations), Business and International Management (161 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (326 citations). Fariss–Terry Mousa has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include William J. Wales, Vishal K. Gupta, Richard Reed, William J. Ritchie, Dan Marlin, Sam Yul Cho, Sang Kyun Kim, Arvin Sahaym, Scott Gallagher and David J. Lemak. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice and Management Decision.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.