F. Elizabeth Gray

50 total papers · 505 total citations
24 papers, 320 citations indexed

About

F. Elizabeth Gray is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Elizabeth Gray has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 320 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 5 papers in Communication and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in F. Elizabeth Gray's work include Accounting Education and Careers (3 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers). F. Elizabeth Gray is often cited by papers focused on Accounting Education and Careers (3 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers). F. Elizabeth Gray collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. F. Elizabeth Gray's co-authors include Bruce R. MacKay, Lisa Emerson, Suzanne Bunniss, Diane Kelly and Mary Simpson and has published in prestigious journals such as New Media & Society, Journal of Science Education and Technology and Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.

In The Last Decade

F. Elizabeth Gray

20 papers receiving 275 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
F. Elizabeth Gray 135 111 62 36 36 24 320
Astrid Schmulian 179 1.3× 157 1.4× 39 0.6× 25 0.7× 45 1.3× 21 329
Mark A. Kretovics 176 1.3× 29 0.3× 57 0.9× 31 0.9× 6 0.2× 25 291
Daniel Dauber 112 0.8× 27 0.2× 20 0.3× 46 1.3× 7 0.2× 19 322
Roy Fisher 181 1.3× 48 0.4× 19 0.3× 17 0.5× 17 0.5× 32 275
Arthur Sweeney 172 1.3× 28 0.3× 86 1.4× 22 0.6× 4 0.1× 18 351
Neil Haigh 198 1.5× 36 0.3× 27 0.4× 8 0.2× 21 0.6× 25 309
Seyed Mehdi Mousavi Davoudi 133 1.0× 17 0.2× 21 0.3× 35 1.0× 13 0.4× 22 344
Evelien Opdecam 236 1.7× 99 0.9× 56 0.9× 34 0.9× 12 0.3× 20 351
Dana Schwieger 130 1.0× 24 0.2× 34 0.5× 26 0.7× 22 0.6× 20 315
Lisa A. Burke‐Smalley 69 0.5× 40 0.4× 38 0.6× 28 0.8× 10 0.3× 22 252

Countries citing papers authored by F. Elizabeth Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Elizabeth Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Elizabeth Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Elizabeth Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Elizabeth Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Elizabeth Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Elizabeth Gray. The network helps show where F. Elizabeth Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Elizabeth Gray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Elizabeth Gray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Elizabeth Gray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Elizabeth Gray. F. Elizabeth Gray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026