Evelyn Fenton

1.0k total citations
11 papers, 575 citations indexed

About

Evelyn Fenton is a scholar working on Accounting, General Health Professions and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Evelyn Fenton has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 575 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Accounting, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Evelyn Fenton's work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). Evelyn Fenton is often cited by papers focused on Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). Evelyn Fenton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Evelyn Fenton's co-authors include Andrew Pettigrew, Paula Jarzabkowski, James T. Walker, Chris Brooks, Frances Griffiths, A. Wild, Ammon Salter, Rossella Salandra, Jean Harvey and Jackie Sturt and has published in prestigious journals such as Organization Science, Research Policy and Long Range Planning.

In The Last Decade

Evelyn Fenton

11 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Evelyn Fenton United Kingdom	10	218	206	91	91	57	11	575
Mary B. Dunn United States	6	223 1.0×	372 1.8×	62 0.7×	102 1.1×	54 0.9×	11	738
Torstein Nesheim Norway	16	144 0.7×	221 1.1×	224 2.5×	103 1.1×	69 1.2×	66	726
Carole K. Barnett United States	9	231 1.1×	256 1.2×	33 0.4×	44 0.5×	90 1.6×	12	672
Andrew Robinson United Kingdom	14	290 1.3×	260 1.3×	95 1.0×	77 0.8×	29 0.5×	29	738
Jeff Ericksen United States	8	190 0.9×	184 0.9×	23 0.3×	61 0.7×	41 0.7×	13	455
Bas Koene Netherlands	11	126 0.6×	337 1.6×	109 1.2×	130 1.4×	21 0.4×	31	622
Ann Martin‐Sardesai Australia	14	101 0.5×	137 0.7×	63 0.7×	211 2.3×	21 0.4×	28	619
Jussi Kivistö Finland	14	82 0.4×	69 0.3×	56 0.6×	32 0.4×	32 0.6×	43	518
Andy Adcroft United Kingdom	14	191 0.9×	141 0.7×	44 0.5×	150 1.6×	53 0.9×	32	705
E.H. Bax Netherlands	5	83 0.4×	241 1.2×	47 0.5×	38 0.4×	16 0.3×	8	429

Countries citing papers authored by Evelyn Fenton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evelyn Fenton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evelyn Fenton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evelyn Fenton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Evelyn Fenton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evelyn Fenton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evelyn Fenton. The network helps show where Evelyn Fenton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Evelyn Fenton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Evelyn Fenton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Evelyn Fenton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Evelyn Fenton. Evelyn Fenton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Walker, James T., Evelyn Fenton, Ammon Salter, & Rossella Salandra. (2018). What Influences Business Academics’ Use of the Association of Business Schools (ABS) List? Evidence From a Survey of UK Academics. British Journal of Management. 30(3). 730–747. 47 indexed citations

2.

Brooks, Chris, Evelyn Fenton, Lisa Schopohl, & James T. Walker. (2018). Why does research in finance have so little impact?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 58. 24–52. 32 indexed citations

3.

Brooks, Chris, Evelyn Fenton, Lisa Schopohl, & James T. Walker. (2016). Why Does Research in Finance Have so Little Impact?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

4.

Brooks, Chris, Evelyn Fenton, & James T. Walker. (2014). Gender and the evaluation of research. Research Policy. 43(6). 990–1001. 47 indexed citations

5.

Fenton, Evelyn. (2007). Visualising Strategic Change:. European Management Journal. 25(2). 104–117. 26 indexed citations

6.

Fenton, Evelyn, Janet Harvey, & Jackie Sturt. (2007). Evaluating primary care research networks. Health Services Management Research. 20(3). 162–173. 15 indexed citations

7.

Jarzabkowski, Paula & Evelyn Fenton. (2006). Strategizing and Organizing in Pluralistic Contexts. Long Range Planning. 39(6). 631–648. 154 indexed citations

8.

Fenton, Evelyn, et al.. (2001). Reflections from organization science on the development of primary health care research networks. Family Practice. 18(5). 540–544. 26 indexed citations

9.

Griffiths, Frances, A. Wild, Jean Harvey, & Evelyn Fenton. (2000). The productivity of primary care research networks.. PubMed. 50(460). 913–5. 39 indexed citations

10.

Pettigrew, Andrew & Evelyn Fenton. (2000). The Innovating Organization. 157 indexed citations

11.

Whittington, Richard, et al.. (1999). Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study, 1992–1996. Organization Science. 10(2). 583–600. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact