Eugene H. Buder

51 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Eugene H. Buder
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Developmental Biology 100
  • Pharmacy 177
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 400
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 382
  • Physiology 371
Replace Shigeru Kiritani with:
Shigeru Kiritani Japan
Lucie Ménard Canada
Diana Van Lancker Sidtis United States
Barbara L. Davis United States
Rebecca E. Eilers United States
Derek M. Houston United States
Judit Gervain France
Liat Kishon‐Rabin Israel
Gerald M. Siegel United States
Harvey M. Sussman United States
Eugene H. Buder relative to Shigeru Kiritani Japan Shigeru Kiritani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Shigeru Kiritani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eugene H. Buder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene H. Buder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene H. Buder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene H. Buder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene H. Buder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene H. Buder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene H. Buder. The network helps show where Eugene H. Buder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eugene H. Buder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eugene H. Buder Line = papers co-authored together Eugene H. Buder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001127
2 2013125
3 199590
4 200477
5 199569
6 201957
7 199747
8 200447
9 202043
10 200740
11 201234
12 199433
13 199233
14 201633
15 200231
16 199128
17 201928
18 199627
19 201227
20 199426

About Eugene H. Buder

Eugene H. Buder is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Physiology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Signal Processing, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (18 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (15 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (13 papers), Language Development and Disorders (10 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (8 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (6 papers), Infant Health and Development (5 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (100 citations), Pharmacy (177 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (400 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (382 citations) and Physiology (371 citations). Eugene H. Buder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Austria. Frequent co-authors include D. Kimbrough Oller, Carol Stoel‐Gammon, Lesya B. Chorna, Anne S. Warlaumont, Lorraine O. Ramig, Edythe A. Strand, Michael P. Lynch, Michele L. Steffens, Margaret Kehoe and Roger Bakeman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Journal of Voice, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics and Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact