Rebecca E. Eilers

4.6k total citations
92 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Rebecca E. Eilers is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebecca E. Eilers has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 36 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 32 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Rebecca E. Eilers's work include Language Development and Disorders (40 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (26 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (20 papers). Rebecca E. Eilers is often cited by papers focused on Language Development and Disorders (40 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (26 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (20 papers). Rebecca E. Eilers collaborates with scholars based in United States, Qatar and Germany. Rebecca E. Eilers's co-authors include D. Kimbrough Oller, Michael P. Lynch, Richard C. Urbano, Wesley R. Wilson, Adrian Neal, William J. Gavin, Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, John M. Moore, Heidi K. Schwartz and Michele L. Steffens and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Trends in Neurosciences and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Rebecca E. Eilers

88 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rebecca E. Eilers United States 30 1.9k 1.2k 1.1k 520 265 92 2.9k
Josiane Bertoncini France 26 2.9k 1.5× 1.9k 1.6× 1.3k 1.2× 491 0.9× 200 0.8× 48 3.9k
Denis Burnham Australia 35 2.2k 1.2× 2.6k 2.2× 1.9k 1.7× 433 0.8× 312 1.2× 184 4.3k
Carol Stoel‐Gammon United States 33 3.1k 1.6× 1.9k 1.6× 1.1k 1.0× 290 0.6× 120 0.5× 84 3.8k
Francisco Lacerda Sweden 15 1.5k 0.8× 1.4k 1.2× 853 0.8× 176 0.3× 220 0.8× 76 2.6k
Einar R. Siqueland United States 12 1.2k 0.6× 822 0.7× 664 0.6× 188 0.4× 110 0.4× 14 1.9k
Thierry Nazzi France 38 3.8k 2.0× 2.4k 2.1× 1.5k 1.4× 359 0.7× 167 0.6× 131 4.9k
Feng‐Ming Tsao Taiwan 17 1.4k 0.7× 886 0.8× 798 0.7× 181 0.3× 96 0.4× 32 2.2k
Rochelle S. Newman United States 26 1.4k 0.7× 1.1k 1.0× 1.2k 1.1× 148 0.3× 275 1.0× 108 2.4k
Derek M. Houston United States 27 2.0k 1.0× 928 0.8× 1.3k 1.2× 177 0.3× 149 0.6× 69 2.7k
Bénédicte de Boysson-Bardies France 18 1.5k 0.8× 1.1k 0.9× 398 0.4× 262 0.5× 71 0.3× 33 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca E. Eilers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca E. Eilers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca E. Eilers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca E. Eilers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca E. Eilers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca E. Eilers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca E. Eilers. The network helps show where Rebecca E. Eilers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca E. Eilers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca E. Eilers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca E. Eilers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca E. Eilers. Rebecca E. Eilers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Oller, D. Kimbrough, et al.. (2015). Curricula Objectives for Educators of Children with Cochlear Implants. Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology. 48. 216–221.
2.
Eilers, Rebecca E., Johanna H. Kleinveld, Elizabeth Vroom, Marjan J. Westerman, & Anne Marie Plass. (2012). Desirability of early identification of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD): parent’s experiences of the period prior to diagnosis.. European Journal of Public Health. 22. 265–265. 3 indexed citations
3.
Parks, Joseph, Aaron Radke, Gordon Parker, et al.. (2008). Principles of Antipsychotic Prescribing for Policy Makers, Circa 2008. Translating Knowledge to Promote Individualized Treatment. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 35(5). 931–936. 35 indexed citations
4.
Oller, D. Kimbrough, Rebecca E. Eilers, Adrian Neal, & Heidi K. Schwartz. (1999). Precursors to speech in infancy. Journal of Communication Disorders. 32(4). 223–245. 197 indexed citations
5.
Oller, D. Kimbrough, Rebecca E. Eilers, Adrian Neal, & Alan B. Cobo-Lewis. (1998). Late Onset Canonical Babbling: A Possible Early Marker of Abnormal Development. American Journal on Mental Retardation. 103(3). 249–249. 95 indexed citations
6.
Herrmann, W.M., et al.. (1997). On the Use of Neural Network Techniques to Analyze Sleep EEG Data. Neuropsychobiology. 37(1). 49–58. 24 indexed citations
7.
Eilers, Rebecca E., et al.. (1997). On the use of neural network techniques to analyze sleep EEG data. Somnologie - Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin. 1(4). 171–183. 5 indexed citations
8.
Herrmann, W.M., et al.. (1997). On the Use of Neural Network Techniques to Analyse Sleep EEG Data. Neuropsychobiology. 36(4). 194–210. 22 indexed citations
9.
Eilers, Rebecca E. & Charles I. Berlín. (1995). Advances in early detection of hearing loss in infants. Current Problems in Pediatrics. 25(2). 60–66. 1 indexed citations
10.
Eilers, Rebecca E., et al.. (1994). Infant vocalizations and the early diagnosis of severe hearing impairment. The Journal of Pediatrics. 124(2). 199–203. 130 indexed citations
11.
Eilers, Rebecca E.. (1993). Tactile Vocoders as Aids to Speech Production in Young Hearing-Impaired Children.. The Volta Review. 95(3). 1 indexed citations
12.
Lynch, Michael P. & Rebecca E. Eilers. (1992). A study of perceptual development for musical tuning. Perception & Psychophysics. 52(6). 599–608. 62 indexed citations
13.
Lynch, Michael P., et al.. (1991). Influences of acculturation and musical sophistication on perception of musical interval patterns.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 17(4). 967–975. 31 indexed citations
14.
Eilers, Rebecca E., et al.. (1991). Optimization of Automated Hearing Test Algorithms. Ear and Hearing. 12(3). 191–198. 13 indexed citations
15.
Delgado, Rafael E., et al.. (1990). Computer Methods for On-Line Hearing Testing with Auditory Brain Stem Responses. Ear and Hearing. 11(6). 417–429. 13 indexed citations
16.
Eilers, Rebecca E.. (1989). Speech and Language Progress of Hearing-Impaired Children in a Systematic Training Program Using Tactual Vocoders.. The Volta Review. 91(5). 3 indexed citations
17.
Oller, D. Kimbrough, et al.. (1988). Computer system for quantitative evaluation of an electrotactile vocoder for artificial hearing. Computers and Biomedical Research. 21(1). 85–100. 3 indexed citations
18.
Oller, D. Kimbrough & Rebecca E. Eilers. (1988). The Role of Audition in Infant Babbling. Child Development. 59(2). 441–449. 29 indexed citations
19.
Eilers, Rebecca E., William J. Gavin, & Wesley R. Wilson. (1980). Effects of Early Linguistic Experience on Speech Discrimination by Infants: A Reply. Child Development. 51(1). 113–113. 9 indexed citations
20.
Eilers, Rebecca E., Wesley R. Wilson, & John M. Moore. (1979). Speech discrimination in the language-innocent and the language-wise: a study in the perception of voice onset time. Journal of Child Language. 6(1). 1–18. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026