Erin L. Borry

716 total citations
21 papers, 447 citations indexed

About

Erin L. Borry is a scholar working on Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Erin L. Borry has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 447 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Administration, 7 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Erin L. Borry's work include Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers). Erin L. Borry is often cited by papers focused on Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers). Erin L. Borry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and China. Erin L. Borry's co-authors include Alexander C. Henderson, Leisha DeHart‐Davis, Wesley Kaufmann, Heather Getha‐Taylor, Suzanne J. Piotrowski, Zachary Mohr, Lars Tummers and Maja Husar Holmes and has published in prestigious journals such as Public Administration Review, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory and Public Administration.

In The Last Decade

Erin L. Borry

20 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Erin L. Borry United States 13 172 135 135 86 71 21 447
Douglas M. Ihrke United States 14 228 1.3× 142 1.1× 244 1.8× 106 1.2× 83 1.2× 47 607
Fabian Hattke Germany 12 135 0.8× 144 1.1× 123 0.9× 105 1.2× 119 1.7× 27 516
Heather Getha‐Taylor United States 12 159 0.9× 159 1.2× 245 1.8× 89 1.0× 82 1.2× 32 541
Willow S. Jacobson United States 11 113 0.7× 164 1.2× 178 1.3× 51 0.6× 78 1.1× 27 422
Kevin Orr United Kingdom 13 139 0.8× 197 1.5× 107 0.8× 47 0.5× 109 1.5× 30 489
David G. Carnevale United States 8 146 0.8× 138 1.0× 137 1.0× 66 0.8× 59 0.8× 21 413
Noortje de Boer Netherlands 12 167 1.0× 59 0.4× 110 0.8× 71 0.8× 87 1.2× 19 356
Randall S. Davis United States 15 246 1.4× 268 2.0× 298 2.2× 119 1.4× 68 1.0× 29 602
Jared J. Llorens United States 11 108 0.6× 141 1.0× 168 1.2× 47 0.5× 78 1.1× 19 442
Ulrik Hvidman Denmark 6 131 0.8× 55 0.4× 171 1.3× 41 0.5× 63 0.9× 8 327

Countries citing papers authored by Erin L. Borry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erin L. Borry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erin L. Borry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erin L. Borry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erin L. Borry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erin L. Borry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erin L. Borry. The network helps show where Erin L. Borry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erin L. Borry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erin L. Borry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erin L. Borry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erin L. Borry. Erin L. Borry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Borry, Erin L., et al.. (2024). Teaching Public Administration with Pop Culture.
2.
Borry, Erin L., et al.. (2023). Staking the tent at the margins: Using disability justice to expand the theory and praxis of social equity in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 46(1). 95–120. 5 indexed citations
3.
Borry, Erin L., et al.. (2022). Humanizing Bureaucracy: Applying the Human Rights-Based Approach to Weber’s Bureaucracy. 5(2). 164–173. 8 indexed citations
4.
Kaufmann, Wesley, Erin L. Borry, & Leisha DeHart‐Davis. (2022). Can effective organizational rules keep employees from leaving? a study of green tape and turnover intention. Public Management Review. 25(8). 1427–1448. 12 indexed citations
5.
DeHart‐Davis, Leisha, et al.. (2022). Managerial Practice and Diversity Climate: The Roles of Workplace Voice, Centralization, and Teamwork. Public Administration Review. 82(3). 459–472. 20 indexed citations
6.
Borry, Erin L., Heather Getha‐Taylor, & Maja Husar Holmes. (2021). Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal Workforce: Executive Order 13583 and Demographic Trends. Public Administration Quarterly. 45(4). 392–417. 5 indexed citations
7.
Henderson, Alexander C. & Erin L. Borry. (2020). The emotional burdens of public service: rules, trust, and emotional labour in emergency medical services. Public Money & Management. 43(5). 405–414. 24 indexed citations
8.
Borry, Erin L.. (2020). Social Equity and Popular Culture: Gender and Gender Identity on TV. Public Integrity. 23(3). 235–252. 4 indexed citations
9.
Borry, Erin L. & Alexander C. Henderson. (2019). Patients, Protocols, and Prosocial Behavior: Rule Breaking in Frontline Health Care. The American Review of Public Administration. 50(1). 45–61. 53 indexed citations
10.
Borry, Erin L.. (2018). Linking theory to television: Public administration in Parks and Recreation. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 24(2). 234–254. 13 indexed citations
11.
Kaufmann, Wesley, Erin L. Borry, & Leisha DeHart‐Davis. (2018). More than Pathological Formalization: Understanding Organizational Structure and Red Tape. Public Administration Review. 79(2). 236–245. 56 indexed citations
12.
Borry, Erin L.. (2018). Rules can be Good. Really.. International Public Management Journal. 22(1). 207–212. 1 indexed citations
13.
Borry, Erin L., et al.. (2018). Formalization and consistency heighten organizational rule following: Experimental and survey evidence. Public Administration. 96(2). 368–385. 46 indexed citations
14.
Borry, Erin L. & Heather Getha‐Taylor. (2018). Automation in the Public Sector: Efficiency at the Expense of Equity?. Public Integrity. 21(1). 6–21. 20 indexed citations
15.
Borry, Erin L.. (2017). Teaching Public Ethics with TV: Parks and Recreation as a Source of Case Studies. Public Integrity. 20(3). 300–315. 20 indexed citations
16.
Borry, Erin L.. (2017). ETHICAL CLIMATE AND RULE BENDING: HOW ORGANIZATIONAL NORMS CONTRIBUTE TO UNINTENDED RULE CONSEQUENCES. Public Administration. 95(1). 78–96. 64 indexed citations
17.
Getha‐Taylor, Heather, et al.. (2016). Are Competencies Universal or Situational? A State-Level Investigation of Collaborative Competencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 36(3). 306–320. 18 indexed citations
18.
Borry, Erin L.. (2016). A New Measure of Red Tape: Introducing the Three-Item Red Tape (TIRT) Scale. International Public Management Journal. 19(4). 573–593. 40 indexed citations
19.
Borry, Erin L.. (2015). “Bureaucracy and Dissent” or “The Ethics of Red Tape”? Linking Red Tape and Guerrilla Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 25(3). 996–1003. 1 indexed citations
20.
Piotrowski, Suzanne J. & Erin L. Borry. (2010). An analytic framework for open meetings and transparency. 15(1). 138–176. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026