Emma Carey

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
13 papers, 833 citations indexed

About

Emma Carey is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Carey has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 833 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 6 papers in Statistics and Probability and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emma Carey's work include Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (8 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers) and Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (3 papers). Emma Carey is often cited by papers focused on Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (8 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers) and Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (3 papers). Emma Carey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Emma Carey's co-authors include Dénes Szűcs, Amy Devine, Francesca Hill, Francesca Hill, Irene C. Mammarella, Sara Caviola, Timothy R Myers, Sangita Sharma, Sibhatu Biadgilign and Tony Sheehy and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Educational Psychology and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Emma Carey

13 papers receiving 798 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The Chicken or the Egg? The Direction of the Relationship Between Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Performance

2016 286 citations Emma Carey, Francesca Hill et al. Frontiers in Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emma Carey United Kingdom	9	498	335	316	262	141	13	833
Francesca Hill United Kingdom	8	601 1.2×	379 1.1×	334 1.1×	333 1.3×	141 1.0×	9	891
Marian Hickendorff Netherlands	15	250 0.5×	353 1.1×	242 0.8×	111 0.4×	243 1.7×	32	904
Marjorie W. Schaeffer United States	7	173 0.3×	358 1.1×	171 0.5×	92 0.4×	109 0.8×	14	547
José Ignacio Navarro Guzmán Spain	16	107 0.2×	404 1.2×	201 0.6×	79 0.3×	243 1.7×	123	783
Piia Maria Björn Finland	14	122 0.2×	352 1.1×	126 0.4×	83 0.3×	180 1.3×	29	555
Sigrid Wimmer Austria	8	157 0.3×	178 0.5×	106 0.3×	102 0.4×	48 0.3×	13	394
Pooja G. Sidney United States	14	169 0.3×	309 0.9×	315 1.0×	46 0.2×	188 1.3×	44	517
Gordon E. Taub United States	13	413 0.8×	161 0.5×	207 0.7×	68 0.3×	343 2.4×	29	793
Sharon Griffin United States	10	95 0.2×	652 1.9×	582 1.8×	63 0.2×	461 3.3×	13	950
Claire Parker United Kingdom	11	174 0.3×	285 0.9×	66 0.2×	110 0.4×	66 0.5×	14	517

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Carey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Carey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Carey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Carey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Carey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Carey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Carey. The network helps show where Emma Carey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Carey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Carey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Carey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Carey. Emma Carey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

Cross, Lauren, Emma Carey, Frances Mathews, et al.. (2024). Navigating changes: reflecting on children and young people’s experiences of public health and social measures during the COVID-19 pandemic- a purposive, qualitative follow-up from a national probability sample. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. 29(1-2). 18–35. 1 indexed citations

Carey, Emma, et al.. (2024). Preferences on Governance Models for Mental Health Data: Qualitative Study With Young People. JMIR Formative Research. 8. e50368–e50368. 1 indexed citations

Carey, Emma, et al.. (2023). Episodic memory during middle childhood: What is developing?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 240. 105828–105828. 2 indexed citations

Jones, Karen L., et al.. (2022). Changes in suspected adverse drug reaction reporting via the yellow card scheme in Wales following the introduction of a National Reporting Indicator. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 88(8). 3829–3836. 5 indexed citations

Sheehy, Tony, Emma Carey, Sangita Sharma, & Sibhatu Biadgilign. (2019). Trends in energy and nutrient supply in Ethiopia: a perspective from FAO food balance sheets. Nutrition Journal. 18(1). 46–46. 28 indexed citations

Carey, Emma, Amy Devine, Francesca Hill, et al.. (2019). Understanding Mathematics Anxiety: Investigating the experiences of UK primary and secondary school students. Apollo (University of Cambridge). 21 indexed citations

Devine, Amy, Francesca Hill, Emma Carey, & Dénes Szűcs. (2018). Cognitive and Emotional Math Problems Largely Dissociate: Prevalence of Developmental Dyscalculia and Mathematics Anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology. 110(3). 431–444. 38 indexed citations

Carey, Emma, Francesca Hill, Amy Devine, & Dénes Szűcs. (2017). The Modified Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Use with Children. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 11–11. 122 indexed citations

Carey, Emma, Amy Devine, Francesca Hill, & Dénes Szűcs. (2017). Differentiating anxiety forms and their role in academic performance from primary to secondary school. PLoS ONE. 12(3). e0174418–e0174418. 99 indexed citations

10.

Caviola, Sara, Emma Carey, Irene C. Mammarella, & Dénes Szűcs. (2017). Stress, Time Pressure, Strategy Selection and Math Anxiety in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 1488–1488. 76 indexed citations

11.

Myers, Timothy R, Emma Carey, & Dénes Szűcs. (2017). Cognitive and Neural Correlates of Mathematical Giftedness in Adults and Children: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 1646–1646. 35 indexed citations

12.

Devine, Amy, Francesca Hill, Emma Carey, & Dénes Szűcs. (2017). Cognitive and emotional math problems largely dissociate: Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia and mathematics anxiety.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 110(3). 431–444. 119 indexed citations

13.

Carey, Emma, Francesca Hill, Amy Devine, & Dénes Szűcs. (2016). The Chicken or the Egg? The Direction of the Relationship Between Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 1987–1987. 286 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact