Emily R. Burnside
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth J. BradburyNicholas D. JamesSebastián DuprazBrett J. HiltonFrank BradkeFred de WinterJoost VerhaagenSina Stern
- Topics
- Spinal Cord Injury Research (7 papers)Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental NeuroscienceCellular and Molecular NeurosciencePathology and Forensic Medicine
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsNeuronPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Emily R. Burnside
12 papers receiving 989 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 561
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 463
- Developmental Neuroscience 256
- Molecular Biology 232
- Neurology 162
Countries citing papers authored by Emily R. Burnside
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily R. Burnside's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily R. Burnside with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily R. Burnside more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily R. Burnside
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily R. Burnside. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily R. Burnside. The network helps show where Emily R. Burnside may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily R. Burnside
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily R. Burnside. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily R. Burnside based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily R. Burnside. Emily R. Burnside is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 61 | |
| 6 | 88 | |
| 7 | 61 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | Moving beyond the glial scar for spinal cord repairbreakdown → | 505 |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 78 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 113 |
About Emily R. Burnside
Emily R. Burnside is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 992 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (7 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (256 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (561 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (463 citations). Emily R. Burnside has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth J. Bradbury, Nicholas D. James, Sebastián Dupraz, Brett J. Hilton, Frank Bradke, Fred de Winter, Joost Verhaagen, Sina Stern, Cord Brakebusch and Elizabeth M. Muir. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Neuron and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.