Nicholas D. James
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth J. BradburyKatalin BartusGrégoire CourtineStephen B. McMahonMark A. AndersonKaren BoschQuentin BarraudElizabeth M. Muir
- Topics
- Spinal Cord Injury Research (14 papers)Nerve injury and regeneration (10 papers)Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental NeurosciencePathology and Forensic MedicineCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nicholas D. James
25 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 790
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 783
- Molecular Biology 633
- Developmental Neuroscience 314
- Neurology 288
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas D. James
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas D. James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas D. James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas D. James more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas D. James
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas D. James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas D. James. The network helps show where Nicholas D. James may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas D. James
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas D. James. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas D. James based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas D. James. Nicholas D. James is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 54 | |
| 3 | 100 | |
| 4 | Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expressionbreakdown → | 376 |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 74 | |
| 8 | Required growth facilitators propel axon regeneration across complete spinal cord injurybreakdown → | 386 |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 73 | |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 179 | |
| 14 | 103 | |
| 15 | 91 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 107 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Nicholas D. James
Nicholas D. James is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 25 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (14 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (10 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (314 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (783 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (790 citations). Nicholas D. James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth J. Bradbury, Katalin Bartus, Grégoire Courtine, Stephen B. McMahon, Mark A. Anderson, Karen Bosch, Quentin Barraud, Elizabeth M. Muir, Jordan W. Squair and Joost Verhaagen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.