Stefanie Poll

806 citations
10 papers · 485 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Stefanie Poll

10 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Stefanie Poll
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Neurology 178
  • Biological Psychiatry 43
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 277
  • Structural Biology 19
  • Developmental Neuroscience 42
Replace Manuel Mittag with:
Manuel Mittag Germany
Kevin Keppler Germany
Emanuele Murana Italy
Grégory Ghézali France
Yulia Dembitskaya Russia
Tal Laviv Israel
Masaaki Kuwajima United States
Emre Fertan Canada
Timothy F. Musial United States
Vadim V. Rogachevsky Russia
Stefanie Poll relative to Manuel Mittag Germany Manuel Mittag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Manuel Mittag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stefanie Poll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stefanie Poll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefanie Poll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefanie Poll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stefanie Poll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefanie Poll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefanie Poll. The network helps show where Stefanie Poll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stefanie Poll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stefanie Poll Line = papers co-authored together Stefanie Poll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2016147
2 2018126
3 201888
4 202047
5 202134
6 202332
7 20197
8
Crystallization of the EGF receptor ectodomain on US space mission STS-47.
19942
9 20251
10 20251

About Stefanie Poll

Stefanie Poll is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (1 paper) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (178 citations), Biological Psychiatry (43 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (277 citations), Structural Biology (19 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (42 citations). Stefanie Poll has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Martin Fuhrmann, Manuel Mittag, Kevin Keppler, Julia Steffen, Jens A. Wagner, Boris Schmidt, Thomas Pfeiffer, V. V. G. Krishna Inavalli, Julie Angibaud and Stéphane Bancelin. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, PLoS Biology, Communications Biology, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory and Molecular Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact