Tak‐Ho Chu

1.4k total citations
35 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Tak‐Ho Chu is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tak‐Ho Chu has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 13 papers in Developmental Neuroscience and 11 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Tak‐Ho Chu's work include Nerve injury and regeneration (17 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (13 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (10 papers). Tak‐Ho Chu is often cited by papers focused on Nerve injury and regeneration (17 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (13 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (10 papers). Tak‐Ho Chu collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Hong Kong and China. Tak‐Ho Chu's co-authors include Huanxing Su, Wutian Wu, Wutian Wu, Qiuju Yuan, Jiasong Guo, Wai Man Wong, Kwok‐Fai So, Bing Hu, Christilyn Graff and Vincent Jung and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Medicine, The Journal of Cell Biology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Tak‐Ho Chu

34 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tak‐Ho Chu Canada 13 410 340 323 249 174 35 1.0k
Matteo Donegà United Kingdom 17 464 1.1× 261 0.8× 373 1.2× 169 0.7× 241 1.4× 24 1.1k
Dong Hoon Hwang South Korea 16 574 1.4× 308 0.9× 287 0.9× 374 1.5× 168 1.0× 30 1.1k
Tobias Fuehrmann Canada 8 331 0.8× 153 0.5× 289 0.9× 270 1.1× 267 1.5× 8 1.0k
Emily R. Burnside United Kingdom 9 561 1.4× 256 0.8× 232 0.7× 463 1.9× 162 0.9× 13 992
Angela R. Filous United States 8 545 1.3× 313 0.9× 225 0.7× 306 1.2× 213 1.2× 11 924
Sylvia Soares France 17 569 1.4× 429 1.3× 454 1.4× 155 0.6× 110 0.6× 25 1.1k
Radhika Puttagunta Germany 18 609 1.5× 313 0.9× 535 1.7× 231 0.9× 73 0.4× 24 1.1k
Chumei Li Canada 16 638 1.6× 401 1.2× 659 2.0× 142 0.6× 107 0.6× 36 1.7k
Tamara Roitbak United States 19 307 0.7× 173 0.5× 577 1.8× 122 0.5× 319 1.8× 21 1.3k
Ana María Gonzalez United Kingdom 16 442 1.1× 200 0.6× 457 1.4× 77 0.3× 141 0.8× 34 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Tak‐Ho Chu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tak‐Ho Chu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tak‐Ho Chu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tak‐Ho Chu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tak‐Ho Chu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tak‐Ho Chu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tak‐Ho Chu. The network helps show where Tak‐Ho Chu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tak‐Ho Chu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tak‐Ho Chu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tak‐Ho Chu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tak‐Ho Chu. Tak‐Ho Chu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mahé, Etienne, Tak‐Ho Chu, Yang Yang, et al.. (2025). Knockout of the ING5 epigenetic regulator confirms roles in stem cell maintenance and tumor suppression in vivo. PLoS ONE. 20(1). e0313255–e0313255. 2 indexed citations
2.
Chu, Tak‐Ho & Rajiv Midha. (2025). Limited Myelination Capacity in Human Schwann Cells in Experimental Models in Comparison to Rodent and Porcine Schwann Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 26(13). 6457–6457. 1 indexed citations
3.
Drouyer, Matthieu, Tak‐Ho Chu, Elodie Labit, et al.. (2024). Novel AAV variants with improved tropism for human Schwann cells. Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development. 32(2). 101234–101234. 5 indexed citations
4.
Chu, Tak‐Ho, et al.. (2023). A Multi-Stage Bioprocess for the Expansion of Rodent Skin-Derived Schwann Cells in Computer-Controlled Bioreactors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24(6). 5152–5152. 1 indexed citations
7.
Balakrishnan, Anjali, Tak‐Ho Chu, Taylor Fleming, et al.. (2021). Insights Into the Role and Potential of Schwann Cells for Peripheral Nerve Repair From Studies of Development and Injury. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 13. 608442–608442. 91 indexed citations
8.
Stratton, Jo Anne, Sarthak Sinha, Elodie Labit, et al.. (2019). Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2 indexed citations
9.
Stratton, Jo Anne, Sarthak Sinha, Elodie Labit, et al.. (2019). Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 4 indexed citations
10.
Chu, Tak‐Ho, Karen Cummins, & Peter K. Stys. (2018). The triple monoamine re-uptake inhibitor DOV 216,303 promotes functional recovery after spinal cord contusion injury in mice. Neuroscience Letters. 675. 1–6. 5 indexed citations
11.
12.
Liu, Xuqing, et al.. (2013). Neural progenitor cell apoptosis and differentiation were affected by activated microglia in spinal cord slice culture. Neurological Sciences. 35(3). 415–419. 7 indexed citations
13.
Chu, Tak‐Ho, et al.. (2012). GDNF‐treated acellular nerve graft promotes motoneuron axon regeneration after implantation into cervical root avulsed spinal cord. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 38(7). 681–695. 19 indexed citations
14.
Yuan, Qiuju, Bing Hu, Tak‐Ho Chu, et al.. (2010). Co-expression of GAP-43 and nNOS in avulsed motoneurons and their potential role for motoneuron regeneration. Nitric Oxide. 23(4). 258–263. 5 indexed citations
15.
Guo, Jiasong, Gkk Leung, Huanxing Su, et al.. (2009). Self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffold promotes the reconstruction of acutely injured brain. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine. 5(3). 345–351. 127 indexed citations
16.
Chu, Tak‐Ho & Wutian Wu. (2009). Neurotrophic Factor Treatment After Spinal Root Avulsion Injury. Central Nervous System Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. 9(1). 40–55. 21 indexed citations
17.
Chu, Tak‐Ho, et al.. (2008). Implantation of Neurotrophic Factor-Treated Sensory Nerve Graft Enhances Survival and Axonal Regeneration of Motoneurons After Spinal Root Avulsion. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. 68(1). 94–101. 26 indexed citations
18.
Chu, Tak‐Ho, et al.. (2008). Motor nerve graft is better than sensory nerve graft for survival and regeneration of motoneurons after spinal root avulsion in adult rats. Experimental Neurology. 212(2). 562–565. 30 indexed citations
19.
Mi, Sha, Bing Hu, Kyungmin Hahm, et al.. (2007). LINGO-1 antagonist promotes spinal cord remyelination and axonal integrity in MOG-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nature Medicine. 13(10). 1228–1233. 382 indexed citations
20.
Chu, Tak‐Ho & Wutian Wu. (2006). Nitric oxide synthase inhibitor attenuates number of regenerating spinal motoneurons in adult rats. Neuroreport. 17(10). 969–973. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026