Tien-chen Lin

636 total citations
9 papers, 437 citations indexed

About

Tien-chen Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Tien-chen Lin has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 437 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 7 papers in Cell Biology and 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Tien-chen Lin's work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (7 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (5 papers) and Protist diversity and phylogeny (3 papers). Tien-chen Lin is often cited by papers focused on Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (7 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (5 papers) and Protist diversity and phylogeny (3 papers). Tien-chen Lin collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and France. Tien-chen Lin's co-authors include Annett Neuner, Annette Scharf, Ursula Jäkle, Wanlu Zhang, Peng Liu, Takumi Chinen, Diana Rüthnick, Christian Benda, Robert A. Arkowitz and Dirk Flemming and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Neuron and The Journal of Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Tien-chen Lin

9 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tien-chen Lin Germany	8	360	337	47	44	26	9	437
Mickaël Machicoane France	4	266 0.7×	396 1.2×	22 0.5×	24 0.5×	8 0.3×	6	483
Olga I. Kahn Netherlands	8	151 0.4×	198 0.6×	68 1.4×	14 0.3×	34 1.3×	8	281
Didier Job France	8	270 0.8×	214 0.6×	36 0.8×	25 0.6×	13 0.5×	8	344
Seiichi Uchimura Japan	8	242 0.7×	275 0.8×	19 0.4×	31 0.7×	3 0.1×	10	323
Eva Karasmanis United States	7	220 0.6×	201 0.6×	23 0.5×	10 0.2×	5 0.2×	13	315
Sonja Stenmark Sweden	11	389 1.1×	279 0.8×	32 0.7×	28 0.6×	3 0.1×	11	462
Laurent Chesneau France	6	244 0.7×	336 1.0×	16 0.3×	32 0.7×	4 0.2×	10	413
Mara M. Wieser Switzerland	5	225 0.6×	189 0.6×	88 1.9×	29 0.7×	5 0.2×	8	399
Ngang Heok Tang United States	11	302 0.8×	159 0.5×	21 0.4×	60 1.4×	7 0.3×	13	369
Wenqi Zuo China	11	335 0.9×	276 0.8×	18 0.4×	27 0.6×	15 0.6×	23	468

Countries citing papers authored by Tien-chen Lin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tien-chen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tien-chen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tien-chen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tien-chen Lin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tien-chen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tien-chen Lin. The network helps show where Tien-chen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tien-chen Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tien-chen Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tien-chen Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tien-chen Lin. Tien-chen Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Kugler, Christof, Nelli Blank, Nicole Reichenbach, et al.. (2022). Pregabalin improves axon regeneration and motor outcome in a rodent stroke model. Brain Communications. 4(4). fcac170–fcac170. 6 indexed citations

2.

Hilton, Brett J., Andreas Husch, Barbara Schaffran, et al.. (2021). An active vesicle priming machinery suppresses axon regeneration upon adult CNS injury. Neuron. 110(1). 51–69.e7. 61 indexed citations

3.

Rüthnick, Diana, et al.. (2018). The microtubule polymerase Stu2 promotes oligomerization of the γ-TuSC for cytoplasmic microtubule nucleation. eLife. 7. 40 indexed citations

4.

Lin, Tien-chen, Annett Neuner, Dirk Flemming, et al.. (2016). MOZART1 and γ-tubulin complex receptors are both required to turn γ-TuSC into an active microtubule nucleation template. The Journal of Cell Biology. 215(6). 823–840. 39 indexed citations

5.

Chinen, Takumi, Peng Liu, Berati Cerikan, et al.. (2015). The γ-tubulin-specific inhibitor gatastatin reveals temporal requirements of microtubule nucleation during the cell cycle. Nature Communications. 6(1). 8722–8722. 47 indexed citations

6.

Lin, Tien-chen, et al.. (2014). Targeting of γ-tubulin complexes to microtubule organizing centers: conservation and divergence. Trends in Cell Biology. 25(5). 296–307. 94 indexed citations

7.

Neuner, Annett, et al.. (2014). Molecular Mechanisms that Restrict Yeast Centrosome Duplication to One Event per Cell Cycle. Current Biology. 24(13). 1456–1466. 40 indexed citations

8.

Lin, Tien-chen, et al.. (2014). Cell-cycle dependent phosphorylation of yeast pericentrin regulates γ-TuSC-mediated microtubule nucleation. eLife. 3. e02208–e02208. 71 indexed citations

9.

Lin, Tien-chen, et al.. (2011). Phosphorylation of the Yeast γ-Tubulin Tub4 Regulates Microtubule Function. PLoS ONE. 6(5). e19700–e19700. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact