Fred de Winter

3.7k citations
52 papers · 2.8k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Fred de Winter

48 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Fred de Winter
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Developmental Neuroscience 765
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.9k
  • Cell Biology 484
  • Genetics 280
  • Neurology 188
Replace Feng‐Quan Zhou with:
Feng‐Quan Zhou United States
Fatiha Nothias France
Von R. King United Kingdom
Igor Jakovčevski Germany
Richard R. Ribchester United Kingdom
Philip Barker Canada
Silvia De Biasi Italy
Markus H. Schwab Germany
Surindar S. Cheema Australia
Carlos Vicario‐Abejón Spain
Fred de Winter relative to Feng‐Quan Zhou United States Feng‐Quan Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Feng‐Quan Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred de Winter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred de Winter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred de Winter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred de Winter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred de Winter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred de Winter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred de Winter. The network helps show where Fred de Winter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred de Winter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred de Winter Line = papers co-authored together Fred de Winter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999260
2 2014230
3 2002223
4 1998160
5 2006140
6 2005120
7 2013110
8 202098
9 201484
10 202180
11 201878
12 202077
13 201372
14 202270
15 199670
16 201967
17 202166
18 202261
19 200259
20 201657

About Fred de Winter

Fred de Winter is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (29 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (17 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (12 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (10 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (8 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (7 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers) and Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (765 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.9k citations), Cell Biology (484 citations), Genetics (280 citations) and Neurology (188 citations). Fred de Winter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joost Verhaagen, R. Jeroen Pasterkamp, Anthony Holtmaat, Elizabeth B. Moloney, Joris de Wit, Marc J. Ruitenberg, Martijn J. A. Malessy, Martijn R. Tannemaat, Daniela Carulli and Roman J. Giger. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, Brain, PLoS ONE and Progress in brain research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact