Emily J. Salisbury
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Health top 2%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Patricia Van VoorhisAshley BaumanEmily M. WrightEmily WrightTim BrennanWilliam DieterichKris HenningRobert Holdford
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (21 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Emily J. Salisbury
35 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- General Health Professions 459
- Health 293
- Epidemiology 92
Countries citing papers authored by Emily J. Salisbury
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily J. Salisbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily J. Salisbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily J. Salisbury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily J. Salisbury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily J. Salisbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily J. Salisbury. The network helps show where Emily J. Salisbury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily J. Salisbury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily J. Salisbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily J. Salisbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily J. Salisbury. Emily J. Salisbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 149 | |
| 15 | 131 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 289 | |
| 18 | 392 | |
| 19 | 116 | |
| 20 | GENDERED PATHWAYS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF WOMEN OFFENDERS' UNIQUE PATHS TO CRIME | 5 |
About Emily J. Salisbury
Emily J. Salisbury is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (21 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Health (293 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.2k citations). Emily J. Salisbury has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Van Voorhis, Ashley Bauman, Emily M. Wright, Emily Wright, Tim Brennan, William Dieterich, Kris Henning, Robert Holdford, Jody L. Sundt and Bridget N. Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Criminal Justice and Behavior and Crime & Delinquency.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.