Emily J. Salisbury

2.4k total citations
38 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Emily J. Salisbury is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily J. Salisbury has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 21 papers in Clinical Psychology and 11 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Emily J. Salisbury's work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (21 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers). Emily J. Salisbury is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (21 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers). Emily J. Salisbury collaborates with scholars based in United States and Norway. Emily J. Salisbury's co-authors include Patricia Van Voorhis, Ashley Bauman, Emily M. Wright, Emily Wright, William Dieterich, Tim Brennan, Robert Holdford, Kris Henning, Jody L. Sundt and Bridget N. Kelly and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Criminal Justice and Behavior and Crime & Delinquency.

In The Last Decade

Emily J. Salisbury

35 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily J. Salisbury United States 13 1.2k 1.1k 459 293 92 38 1.5k
Sheryl Kubiak United States 21 680 0.6× 913 0.8× 412 0.9× 320 1.1× 157 1.7× 104 1.4k
Bonita M. Veysey United States 20 646 0.5× 738 0.7× 360 0.8× 131 0.4× 112 1.2× 51 1.2k
Stephane M. Shepherd Australia 19 667 0.6× 727 0.7× 249 0.5× 228 0.8× 36 0.4× 85 1.2k
Jennifer Wareham United States 15 448 0.4× 586 0.5× 254 0.6× 172 0.6× 85 0.9× 82 951
Lisa Pasko United States 10 683 0.6× 452 0.4× 220 0.5× 143 0.5× 47 0.5× 23 858
Janet L. Mullings United States 18 774 0.7× 509 0.5× 397 0.9× 100 0.3× 74 0.8× 32 1.0k
Ivan Zinger Canada 9 1.2k 1.0× 1.3k 1.2× 300 0.7× 75 0.3× 131 1.4× 15 1.6k
Cynthia L. Blitz United States 14 662 0.6× 591 0.5× 235 0.5× 103 0.4× 59 0.6× 22 943
Jessica R. Goodkind United States 21 503 0.4× 753 0.7× 495 1.1× 438 1.5× 26 0.3× 45 1.3k
Cynthia Fraga Rizo United States 18 539 0.5× 494 0.5× 291 0.6× 599 2.0× 120 1.3× 65 978

Countries citing papers authored by Emily J. Salisbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily J. Salisbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily J. Salisbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily J. Salisbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily J. Salisbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily J. Salisbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily J. Salisbury. The network helps show where Emily J. Salisbury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily J. Salisbury

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily J. Salisbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily J. Salisbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily J. Salisbury. Emily J. Salisbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McGlothen‐Bell, Kelly, et al.. (2025). A reproductive justice investigation of utilizing digital interventions among underserved populations with criminal legal system supervision: Policy brief. Nursing Outlook. 73(2). 102349–102349. 1 indexed citations
4.
Salisbury, Emily J., et al.. (2024). An intervention development study of an mHealth app to manage women’s health and safety while on probation. Health & Justice. 12(1). 22–22. 4 indexed citations
5.
Salisbury, Emily J., et al.. (2023). Gender-Responsive Probation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning from Justice-Involved Women and Their Supervising Officers. Victims & Offenders. 18(8). 1498–1520. 5 indexed citations
6.
Salisbury, Emily J., et al.. (2023). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Community Health Specialists Within Gender-Responsive Probation Supervision. Feminist Criminology. 18(5). 406–434. 3 indexed citations
7.
Salisbury, Emily J., et al.. (2021). Did They Move on? An Outcome Evaluation of the Gender-Responsive Program, Girls...Moving On. Feminist Criminology. 17(2). 223–251. 3 indexed citations
8.
Salisbury, Emily J., et al.. (2019). Bringing Course Material to Life through Experiential Learning: Impacts on Students’ Learning and Perceptions in a Corrections Course. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 31(2). 161–186. 14 indexed citations
9.
Voorhis, Patricia Van, et al.. (2017). Programmatic Moderators of CBT Correctional Treatment for Whites and African Americans. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 62(8). 2236–2258. 2 indexed citations
10.
Sundt, Jody L., et al.. (2017). The Limitations and Strengths of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale as a Measure of Correctional Employees’ Attitudes: A Psychometric Evaluation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 62(12). 3947–3964. 2 indexed citations
11.
Salisbury, Emily J., et al.. (2017). Expanding the Feminist Pathways Perspective beyond the United States: A Profile of Federal Women Prisoners in Argentina. Women & Criminal Justice. 28(2). 125–151. 7 indexed citations
12.
Salisbury, Emily J., et al.. (2016). Gender-Responsive Risk and Need Assessment. 1 indexed citations
13.
Salisbury, Emily J., et al.. (2016). Gender-Responsive Risk and Need Assessment: Implications for the Treatment of Justice-Involved Women. 236–259. 5 indexed citations
14.
Voorhis, Patricia Van & Emily J. Salisbury. (2016). Correctional Counseling and Rehabilitation. 30 indexed citations
15.
Voorhis, Patricia Van, Emily J. Salisbury, Emily Wright, & Ashley Bauman. (2015). 1 Achieving Accurate Pictures of Risk and Identifying Gender Responsive Needs: Two New Assessments for Women Offenders1. 27 indexed citations
16.
Salisbury, Emily J., et al.. (2013). Moderators of Correctional Treatment Success. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 58(7). 835–860. 10 indexed citations
17.
Wright, Emily M., Patricia Van Voorhis, Emily J. Salisbury, & Ashley Bauman. (2012). Gender-Responsive Lessons Learned and Policy Implications for Women in Prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 39(12). 1612–1632. 149 indexed citations
18.
Salisbury, Emily J. & Meda Chesney‐Lind. (2012). Patricia Van Voorhis. Criminology & Public Policy. 11(2). 147–153. 1 indexed citations
19.
Salisbury, Emily J. & Patricia Van Voorhis. (2009). Gendered Pathways. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 36(6). 541–566. 392 indexed citations
20.
Wright, Emily, Emily J. Salisbury, & Patricia Van Voorhis. (2007). Predicting the Prison Misconducts of Women Offenders. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 23(4). 310–340. 116 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026