Countries where authors publish in Crime & Delinquency
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Crime & Delinquency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Crime & Delinquency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crime & Delinquency more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Crime & Delinquency. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Crime & Delinquency.
About Crime & Delinquency
The 2.7k papers published in Crime & Delinquency in the last decades have received a total of 61.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Crime & Delinquency usually cover Sociology and Political Science (2.1k papers), Clinical Psychology (794 papers), Health (292 papers), General Health Professions (448 papers) and Gender Studies (116 papers) specifically the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (1.3k papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1.2k papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (459 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (390 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (204 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (198 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (197 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (146 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Crime & Delinquency are Robert J. Sampson, John H. Laub, Herman Goldstein, Wesley G. Skogan, Meda Chesney‐Lind, D. A. Andrews, Beth E. Richie, Alex R. Piquero, Arthur J. Lurigio and James Bonta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.