Emily Wright
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Safety Research top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports 5
-
- Sport Psychology and Performance 3
- Co-authors
- Emily J. Salisbury (2 shared papers)Patricia Van Voorhis (2 shared papers)Jean‐François Briat (1 shared paper)D. E. Sayers (1 shared paper)E C Theil (1 shared paper)Sam N. Thrower (1 shared paper)Travis E. Dorsch (1 shared paper)Sam Elliott (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (1 paper)Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (1 paper)PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (1 paper)Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice (1 paper)Psychology of sport and exercise (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
Emily Wright
14 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Clinical Psychology 134
- Safety Research 39
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 49
- Social Psychology 74
- Hematology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Wright. The network helps show where Emily Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 116 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 51 | |
| 4 | 1 Achieving Accurate Pictures of Risk and Identifying Gender Responsive Needs: Two New Assessments for Women Offenders1 | 2015 | 27 |
| 5 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 2 |
About Emily Wright
Emily Wright is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 14 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (5 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (3 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (3 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (2 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (1 paper) and Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (134 citations), Safety Research (39 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (49 citations), Social Psychology (74 citations) and Hematology (39 citations). Emily Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Emily J. Salisbury, Patricia Van Voorhis, Jean‐François Briat, D. E. Sayers, E C Theil, Sam N. Thrower, Travis E. Dorsch, Sam Elliott, Camilla J. Knight and Ashley Bauman. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice and Psychology of sport and exercise.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.