Meda Chesney‐Lind
- Health top 0.5%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 14
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Child Abuse and Trauma 14
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 8
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.1%
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 35
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 17
- Sex work and related issues 5
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies 6
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Homelessness and Social Issues 10
Meda Chesney‐Lind
80 papers receiving 4.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Health 963
- Clinical Psychology 2.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 4.2k
- Gender Studies 741
- General Health Professions 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Meda Chesney‐Lind
This map shows the geographic impact of Meda Chesney‐Lind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meda Chesney‐Lind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meda Chesney‐Lind more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Meda Chesney‐Lind
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meda Chesney‐Lind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meda Chesney‐Lind. The network helps show where Meda Chesney‐Lind may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meda Chesney‐Lind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 3 | The Female Offender: Girls, Women, and Crimebreakdown → | 2013 | 277 |
| 4 | 2013 | 56 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 82 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 80 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 73 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 320 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 12 | Representations of Gangs and Delinquency: Wild in the Streets?. | 1997 | 14 |
| 13 | Race and Sex Discrimination in the Academy. | 1995 | 3 |
| 14 | 1994 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 35 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 36 | |
| 17 | Feminism and criminologybreakdown → | 1988 | 499 |
| 18 | 1986 | 140 | |
| 19 | "Everything Just Going Down the Drain." Interviews with Female Delinquents in Hawaii. Report No. 319. | 1985 | 6 |
| 20 | Judicial Enforcement of the Female Sex Role: The Family Court and the Female Delinquent | 1973 | 86 |
About Meda Chesney‐Lind
Meda Chesney‐Lind is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 83 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (35 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (17 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (14 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (14 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (6 papers) and Sex work and related issues (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (963 citations), Clinical Psychology (2.1k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (4.2k citations). Meda Chesney‐Lind has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Pasko, Marc Mauer, Randall G. Shelden, Kathleen Daly, Merry Morash, Katherine Irwin, Karen A. Joe, John M. MacDonald, Michèle J. Eliason and Scott K. Okamoto. Their work appears in journals such as Women & Criminal Justice, Crime & Delinquency, Critical Criminology, Crime Media Culture An International Journal and Justice Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.