Emily M. Wright

3.7k total citations
94 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Emily M. Wright is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily M. Wright has authored 94 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 27 papers in Health and 27 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Emily M. Wright's work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (33 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (25 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (24 papers). Emily M. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Crime Patterns and Interventions (33 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (25 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (24 papers). Emily M. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States, Austria and Germany. Emily M. Wright's co-authors include Abigail A. Fagan, Gillian M. Pinchevsky, Emily J. Salisbury, Ashley Bauman, Patricia Van Voorhis, Michael L. Benson, Marie Skubak Tillyer, Tara N. Richards, Joseph A. Schwartz and Benjamin Steiner and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Child Abuse & Neglect and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

In The Last Decade

Emily M. Wright

90 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily M. Wright United States 25 1.4k 1.1k 946 822 240 94 2.5k
Rafat Hussain Australia 27 495 0.4× 696 0.6× 823 0.9× 602 0.7× 392 1.6× 57 2.9k
Brigette A. Davis United States 10 1.2k 0.8× 796 0.7× 541 0.6× 876 1.1× 154 0.6× 13 2.5k
Einat Peled Israel 21 616 0.4× 791 0.7× 735 0.8× 464 0.6× 183 0.8× 91 1.5k
Anne K. Driscoll United States 28 737 0.5× 789 0.7× 313 0.3× 923 1.1× 318 1.3× 57 3.2k
Aasim I. Padela United States 27 661 0.5× 658 0.6× 624 0.7× 547 0.7× 74 0.3× 129 2.4k
Susan L. Miller United States 22 979 0.7× 416 0.4× 772 0.8× 240 0.3× 573 2.4× 91 1.7k
A Bachu 8 773 0.6× 307 0.3× 234 0.2× 488 0.6× 262 1.1× 13 2.0k
Mary Ann Curry United States 26 1.1k 0.8× 1.1k 1.0× 1.9k 2.0× 453 0.6× 445 1.9× 55 2.8k
Jehonathan Ben Australia 11 1.4k 1.0× 1.2k 1.1× 388 0.4× 688 0.8× 141 0.6× 18 2.6k
Brian D. Smedley United States 19 866 0.6× 336 0.3× 202 0.2× 616 0.7× 229 1.0× 60 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily M. Wright. The network helps show where Emily M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily M. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily M. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily M. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily M. Wright. Emily M. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wright, Emily M., et al.. (2023). Understanding Abuse, Mental Health, and Substance Use: The Role of Victimization in a Jail Population. American Journal of Criminal Justice. 48(6). 1320–1342.
2.
Wright, Emily M., et al.. (2023). Type of Victimization Exposure, Perpetrator Type, and Timing of Victimization: The Impact on Behavioral Health Outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 39(5-6). 1132–1160. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wright, Emily M.. (2021). Dancing to Transform. Intellect Books.
4.
Wright, Emily M., et al.. (2017). Factors associated with reporting of sexual assault among college and non-college women. Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research. 9(4). 279–289. 15 indexed citations
5.
Chen, James Y., et al.. (2016). Extraction of Phospholipids from Human Erythrocyte Membranes by Hemoglobin Oxidation Products. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 249(3). 305–317. 2 indexed citations
6.
Fagan, Abigail A., Emily M. Wright, & Gillian M. Pinchevsky. (2015). A multi-level analysis of the impact of neighborhood structural and social factors on adolescent substance use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 153. 180–186. 35 indexed citations
7.
Fagan, Abigail A., Emily M. Wright, & Gillian M. Pinchevsky. (2014). Exposure to violence, substance use, and neighborhood context. Social Science Research. 49. 314–326. 52 indexed citations
8.
Wright, Emily M., et al.. (2012). Transvaginal Ultrasound for Endometrial Carcinoma Screening – Current Evidence-based Data. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 72(12). 1088–1091. 7 indexed citations
9.
Wright, Emily M., et al.. (2012). Predicting Patriarchy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 28(6). 1267–1288. 22 indexed citations
10.
Fagan, Abigail A. & Emily M. Wright. (2011). Gender differences in the effects of exposure to intimate partner violence on adolescent violence and drug use. Child Abuse & Neglect. 35(7). 543–550. 23 indexed citations
11.
Wright, Emily M.. (2008). Neighborhood Context and Intimate Partner Violence. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network). 1 indexed citations
12.
Steiner, Benjamin & Emily M. Wright. (2006). Assessing the Relative Effects of State Direct File Waiver Laws on Violent Juvenile Crime: Deterrence or Irrelevance?. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-). 96(4). 1451–1477. 16 indexed citations
14.
Schick, S., Emily M. Wright, André Gahleitner, et al.. (1998). Differentiation of benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland: value of pulsed Doppler and color Doppler sonography. European Radiology. 8(8). 1462–1467. 72 indexed citations
15.
Dock, W, F Grabenwöger, Wolfgang Happak, et al.. (1990). Sonographie der Skelettmuskulatur mit hochfrequenten Ultraschallköpfen. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 152(1). 47–50. 4 indexed citations
16.
Klima, G., R Margreiter, Alfred Königsrainer, Emily M. Wright, & Thomas Schmid. (1989). Pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) for early detection of pancreas allograft rejection.. PubMed. 21(1 Pt 3). 2782–3. 3 indexed citations
17.
Klima, G., et al.. (1988). Is the pancreas rejected independently of the kidney after combined pancreatic-renal transplantation?. PubMed. 20(4). 665–7. 1 indexed citations
18.
Aigner, Annette, Alfred Königsrainer, Emily M. Wright, et al.. (1987). Delayed duct occlusion--a new technique of pancreas transplantation.. PubMed. 19(5). 3908–3908. 2 indexed citations
19.
Margreiter, R, Emily M. Wright, Felix Aigner, et al.. (1984). [Initial clinical experiences with allotransplantation of the pancreas].. PubMed. 96(7). 244–9. 1 indexed citations
20.
Weimann, S, et al.. (1978). [Operative therapy of the pilonidal sinus; 115 controlled patients (author's transl)].. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 103(21). 1410–5. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026