Jay P. Singh

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
34 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Jay P. Singh is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jay P. Singh has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Clinical Psychology, 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 11 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Jay P. Singh's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (24 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers). Jay P. Singh is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (24 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers). Jay P. Singh collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and United States. Jay P. Singh's co-authors include Seena Fazel, Martin Grann, Sarah L. Desmarais, Mark R. Serper, Kiersten L. Johnson, John Petrila, Richard A. Van Dorn, Alec Buchanan, Corine de Ruiter and Ralitza Gueorguieva and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Jay P. Singh

31 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A ... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jay P. Singh Norway 14 1.1k 867 186 131 93 34 1.3k
Viviënne de Vogel Netherlands 25 1.8k 1.6× 1.1k 1.3× 242 1.3× 104 0.8× 133 1.4× 105 1.9k
Moira A. Law Canada 6 1.1k 1.0× 899 1.0× 89 0.5× 160 1.2× 104 1.1× 12 1.3k
Laura Salerno Italy 19 517 0.5× 323 0.4× 58 0.3× 148 1.1× 120 1.3× 53 910
Ryan D. Schroeder United States 16 437 0.4× 744 0.9× 188 1.0× 46 0.4× 118 1.3× 36 1.1k
Дон Грубин United Kingdom 26 1.6k 1.4× 1.0k 1.2× 95 0.5× 317 2.4× 273 2.9× 68 1.9k
Katharina Seewald Germany 8 708 0.6× 472 0.5× 55 0.3× 200 1.5× 131 1.4× 15 888
Caroline E. Temcheff Canada 19 717 0.7× 228 0.3× 65 0.3× 82 0.6× 149 1.6× 72 967
Maarten Kunst Netherlands 16 411 0.4× 297 0.3× 91 0.5× 42 0.3× 93 1.0× 67 681
L. Maaike Helmus Canada 24 2.1k 1.9× 1.9k 2.2× 207 1.1× 54 0.4× 82 0.9× 64 2.3k
Julian Walker United Kingdom 16 476 0.4× 259 0.3× 90 0.5× 83 0.6× 251 2.7× 31 716

Countries citing papers authored by Jay P. Singh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay P. Singh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay P. Singh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay P. Singh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay P. Singh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay P. Singh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay P. Singh. The network helps show where Jay P. Singh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay P. Singh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay P. Singh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay P. Singh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jay P. Singh. Jay P. Singh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Eher, Reinhard, Sarah L. Desmarais, Cristina Hurducas, et al.. (2016). Kriminalprognosen in der Praxis. Diagnostica. 63(1). 2–14. 9 indexed citations
3.
Singh, Jay P., Karin Arbach, Sarah L. Desmarais, et al.. (2015). La práctica de la evaluación del riesgo de violencia en España. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 63(3). 357–366. 9 indexed citations
4.
Nielsen, Louise Hjort, Sarah van Mastrigt, Randy K. Otto, et al.. (2015). Violence Risk Assessment Practices in Denmark: A Multidisciplinary National Survey. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 21(2). 103–110. 5 indexed citations
5.
Singh, Jay P., Sarah L. Desmarais, Cristina Hurducas, et al.. (2014). International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 13(3). 193–206. 159 indexed citations
6.
Singh, Jay P., et al.. (2014). Reporting guidance for violence risk assessment predictive validity studies: The RAGEE Statement.. Law and Human Behavior. 39(1). 15–22. 61 indexed citations
7.
Singh, Jay P., Seena Fazel, Ralitza Gueorguieva, & Alec Buchanan. (2014). Rates of violence in patients classified as high risk by structured risk assessment instruments. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 204(3). 180–187. 56 indexed citations
8.
Singh, Jay P., Seena Fazel, Ralitza Gueorguieva, & Alec Buchanan. (2014). Rates of Violence in Patients Classified as High Risk by Structured Risk Assessment Instruments. SSRN Electronic Journal.
9.
Singh, Jay P., et al.. (2013). El uso de instrumentos de evaluacion de riesgo de violencia en Argentina y Chile. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
10.
Singh, Jay P., et al.. (2013). El uso de instrumentos de evaluación de riesgo de violencia en Argentina y Chile (O uso dos instrumentos da avaliação do risco da violência na Argentina e no Chile) (The Use of Violence Risk Assessment Instruments in Argentina and Chile). SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
11.
Rossegger, Astrid, et al.. (2013). Current Obstacles in Replicating Risk Assessment Findings: A Systematic Review of Commonly Used Actuarial Instruments. SSRN Electronic Journal.
12.
Singh, Jay P., Martin Grann, & Seena Fazel. (2013). Authorship Bias in Violence Risk Assessment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 8(9). e72484–e72484. 59 indexed citations
13.
Singh, Jay P., et al.. (2013). From risk assessment to risk management: Matching interventions to adolescent offenders' strengths and vulnerabilities. Children and Youth Services Review. 47(Pt 1). 1–9. 54 indexed citations
14.
Singh, Jay P., Seena Fazel, Ralitza Gueorguieva, & Alec Buchanan. (2012). Rates of Sexual Recidivism in High Risk Sex Offenders: A Meta-analysis of 10,422 Participants. SSRN Electronic Journal. 11 indexed citations
15.
Singh, Jay P., Martin Grann, Paul Lichtenstein, Niklas Långström, & Seena Fazel. (2012). A Novel Approach to Determining Violence Risk in Schizophrenia: Developing a Stepped Strategy in 13,806 Discharged Patients. PLoS ONE. 7(2). e31727–e31727. 4 indexed citations
16.
Hauptfleisch, Jennifer, et al.. (2012). Interobserver Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signs of Osteomyelitis in Pelvic Pressure Ulcers in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 94(6). 1107–1111. 13 indexed citations
17.
Singh, Jay P., et al.. (2011). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Schizophrenia and Other Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Validity, Reliability, and Item Content of 10 Available Instruments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
19.
Singh, Jay P. & Seena Fazel. (2010). Forensic Risk Assessment: A Metareview. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations
20.
Singh, Jay P., Martin Grann, & Seena Fazel. (2010). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review. 31(3). 499–513. 405 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026