Sital Kalantry
- Law top 5%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 4
- Law in Society and Culture 3
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 3
-
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences 5
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 7
-
- Human Rights and Development 7
- Ombudsman and Human Rights 3
-
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts 3
- Co-authors
- Theodore EisenbergNick RobinsonAllison C. PetriniSteven D. SpandorferAnnie YauPriya S. GuptaEmily J. SalisburyWilliam Hubbard
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1 paper)Human Rights Quarterly (1 paper)Women & Criminal Justice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sital Kalantry
26 papers receiving 153 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Law 42
- Gender Studies 28
- Reproductive Medicine 20
- Sociology and Political Science 76
- Political Science and International Relations 39
Countries citing papers authored by Sital Kalantry
This map shows the geographic impact of Sital Kalantry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sital Kalantry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sital Kalantry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sital Kalantry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sital Kalantry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sital Kalantry. The network helps show where Sital Kalantry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Sital Kalantry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 5 | Indigenous Peoples Living in Voluntary Isolation During COVID | 2020 | 0 |
| 6 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 14 | Litigation as a Measure of Well-Being | 2013 | 8 |
| 15 | Sex Selection in the United States and India: A Contextualist Feminist Approach | 2013 | 2 |
| 16 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 20 | Measuring State Compliance with the Right to Education Using Indicators: a Case Study of Colombia’s Obligations Under the ICESCR | 2009 | 1 |
About Sital Kalantry
Sital Kalantry is a scholar working on Law, Reproductive Medicine and Gender Studies, having authored 31 papers that have together received 173 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Human Rights and Development (7 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (5 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 papers), Ombudsman and Human Rights (3 papers) and South Asian Studies and Conflicts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (42 citations), Gender Studies (28 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (20 citations). Sital Kalantry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Theodore Eisenberg, Nick Robinson, Allison C. Petrini, Steven D. Spandorfer, Annie Yau, Priya S. Gupta, Emily J. Salisbury, William Hubbard, Arindam Nandi and William H. Hubbard. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Human Rights Quarterly and Women & Criminal Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.