Emily Gates

450 citations
24 papers · 258 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Gates

22 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Emily Gates
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Management Science and Operations Research 124
  • Public Administration 16
  • General Health Professions 71
  • Applied Psychology 8
  • Information Systems and Management 12
Replace Elliot Stern with:
Elliot Stern United Kingdom
Michael Quinn Patton United States
Yoland Wadsworth Australia
Liliana Rodríguez‐Campos United States
Leslie A. Fierro United States
Jude Fransman United Kingdom
Siobhán Fitzpatrick United Kingdom
Daniel Maxey United States
Donald W. Compton United States
Maria Hepi New Zealand
Emily Gates relative to Elliot Stern United Kingdom Elliot Stern's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Elliot Stern · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Gates. The network helps show where Emily Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Gates Line = papers co-authored together Emily Gates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201640
2 201733
3 201632
4 202125
5 201924
6 201722
7 201818
8 202110
9 202210
10 20217
11 20217
12 20236
13 20224
14 20234
15 20243
16 20233
17 20232
18 20232
19 20232
20 20152

About Emily Gates

Emily Gates is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (18 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (7 papers), Community Health and Development (6 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (6 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (2 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (124 citations), Public Administration (16 citations), General Health Professions (71 citations), Applied Psychology (8 citations) and Information Systems and Management (12 citations). Emily Gates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Dyson, Jori N. Hall, Mat Walton, Richard Hummelbrunner, Bob Williams, Mita Marra, Martin Reynolds, Miles McNall, Rebecca Glover‐Kudon and Kevin Davis. Their work appears in journals such as New Directions for Evaluation, Evaluation, American Journal of Evaluation, Evaluation and Program Planning and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact