Bob Williams

771 total citations
11 papers, 465 citations indexed

About

Bob Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Bob Williams has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 465 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Bob Williams's work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers). Bob Williams is often cited by papers focused on Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers). Bob Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Bob Williams's co-authors include Richard Hummelbrunner, Martin Reynolds, Brian Hopkins, Nadja Reissland, Peter Joseph Benedict Helms, Eric Sarriot, Navonil Mustafee, Robert Chad Swanson, Emily Gates and Mita Marra and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice and Systems Research and Behavioral Science.

In The Last Decade

Bob Williams

10 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Bob Williams United Kingdom	8	157	147	41	34	34	11	465
Derek Cabrera United States	11	353 2.2×	208 1.4×	27 0.7×	28 0.8×	26 0.8×	42	842
Christof Schuster United States	13	110 0.7×	68 0.5×	37 0.9×	92 2.7×	80 2.4×	34	783
David J. Woodruff United States	9	132 0.8×	45 0.3×	26 0.6×	71 2.1×	97 2.9×	19	612
Oscar L. Olvera Astivia Canada	11	58 0.4×	72 0.5×	18 0.4×	39 1.1×	63 1.9×	23	465
Prathiba Natesan United States	14	99 0.6×	30 0.2×	28 0.7×	40 1.2×	76 2.2×	32	445
Rui Rijo Portugal	11	55 0.4×	86 0.6×	16 0.4×	23 0.7×	17 0.5×	72	429
David Goretzko Germany	10	90 0.6×	66 0.4×	33 0.8×	113 3.3×	100 2.9×	27	692
Harvey Wolfe United States	15	92 0.6×	68 0.5×	15 0.4×	32 0.9×	9 0.3×	59	870
Klaus D. Kubinger Austria	14	199 1.3×	39 0.3×	28 0.7×	75 2.2×	100 2.9×	63	797
Carmen Ximénez Spain	11	86 0.5×	31 0.2×	12 0.3×	62 1.8×	51 1.5×	34	362

Countries citing papers authored by Bob Williams

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bob Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bob Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bob Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bob Williams

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bob Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bob Williams. The network helps show where Bob Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bob Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bob Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bob Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bob Williams. Bob Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

Mustafee, Navonil, et al.. (2018). Thinking about complexity in health: A systematic review of the key systems thinking and complexity ideas in health. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 24(3). 600–606. 80 indexed citations

Reynolds, Martin, Emily Gates, Richard Hummelbrunner, Mita Marra, & Bob Williams. (2016). Towards Systemic Evaluation. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 33(5). 662–673. 40 indexed citations

Williams, Bob, et al.. (2015). Family and systemic psychotherapists' experiences of personal therapeutic consultations as a tool for personal and professional development in training. Journal of Family Therapy. 37(4). 563–582. 2 indexed citations

Williams, Bob. (2015). Prosaic or Profound? The Adoption of Systems Ideas by Impact Evaluation. IDS Bulletin. 46(1). 7–16. 30 indexed citations

Williams, Bob, et al.. (2014). Specific design features of an interpretative phenomenological analysis study. Nurse Researcher. 21(3). 8–12. 35 indexed citations

Williams, Bob, et al.. (2014). An evaluation of the independence of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Australasian Psychiatry. 22(5). 473–475. 10 indexed citations

Williams, Bob & Richard Hummelbrunner. (2010). Systems Concepts in Action. Stanford University Press eBooks. 172 indexed citations

Williams, Bob. (2008). Intelligent Transport Systems Standards. 50 indexed citations

Reissland, Nadja, Brian Hopkins, Peter Joseph Benedict Helms, & Bob Williams. (2007). Maternal stress and depression and the lateralisation of infant cradling. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 50(3). 263–269. 44 indexed citations

10.

Barber, K. Suzanne, et al.. (2002). <title>Advanced consequence management program: challenges and recent real-world implementations</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4708. 324–333. 1 indexed citations

11.

Trowbridge, Robert L., et al.. (1990). Boredom in suburbia.. 9(4). 19–23. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact