Evaluation

809 papers and 19.4k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 809 papers published in Evaluation in the last decades have received a total of 19.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Evaluation usually cover Management Science and Operations Research (565 papers), Public Administration (240 papers) and General Health Professions (205 papers) specifically the topics of Evaluation and Performance Assessment (553 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (227 papers) and Community Health and Development (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evaluation are Ray Pawson, Christopher Pollitt, Patricia Rogers, Ana Manzano, Ian Sanderson, John Mayne, Nicoletta Stame, Tineke Abma, Robert Picciotto and Per Mickwitz.

In The Last Decade

Evaluation

729 papers receiving 16.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Evaluation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evaluation.

Countries where authors publish in Evaluation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026