Donald W. Compton
- Management Science and Operations Research top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael BaizermanStacey Hueftle StockdillRebecca Glover‐KudonIris SmithChristopher MorrisMichael SchooleyPaul W. Mattessich
- Topics
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment (14 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers)Educational Assessment and Improvement (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Public AdministrationManagement Science and Operations ResearchInformation Systems and Management
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Donald W. Compton
17 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Management Science and Operations Research 270
- General Health Professions 123
- Public Administration 106
- Information Systems and Management 77
- Applied Psychology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Donald W. Compton
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald W. Compton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald W. Compton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald W. Compton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald W. Compton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald W. Compton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald W. Compton. The network helps show where Donald W. Compton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald W. Compton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald W. Compton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald W. Compton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald W. Compton. Donald W. Compton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | Managing evaluation: Responding to common problems with a 10-step process | 4 |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Managing Evaluation: Explication of a professional practice | 4 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building | 57 |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 146 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 11 |
About Donald W. Compton
Donald W. Compton is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration and Information Systems and Management, having authored 18 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (14 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers) and Educational Assessment and Improvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (106 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (270 citations) and Information Systems and Management (77 citations). Donald W. Compton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Baizerman, Stacey Hueftle Stockdill, Rebecca Glover‐Kudon, Iris Smith, Christopher Morris, Michael Schooley and Paul W. Mattessich. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Evaluation, Cancer Practice and New Directions for Evaluation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.