Emily Eisner

4.4k citations
37 papers · 2.4k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 13

Emily Eisner

33 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancem...1.3k19932026200420154008001.2k

Peers

Emily Eisner
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Applied Psychology 204
  • Education 967
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 156
  • Music 95
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 431
Replace Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg with:
Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg United States
Robert Kegan United States
Mary Gergen United States
John McLeod United Kingdom
Divya Jindal‐Snape United Kingdom
Gregory Arief D. Liem Singapore
Patricia Cranton Canada
Robert Coles United States
Jonathan Tudge United States
Ronald Gallimore United States
Emily Eisner relative to Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg United States Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Eisner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Eisner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Eisner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Eisner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Eisner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Eisner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Eisner. The network helps show where Emily Eisner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Eisner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Eisner Line = papers co-authored together Emily Eisner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20253
3 20251
4 20250
5 202512
6 20242
7 202315
8 20236
9 20236
10 20232
11 202315
12 20231
13 202211
14 201938
15 201855
16 201712
17 2014117
18 201351
19 201129
20 2010168

About Emily Eisner

Emily Eisner is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (16 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (12 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (11 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (9 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (5 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers) and Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (204 citations), Education (967 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (156 citations), Music (95 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (431 citations). Emily Eisner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Muir Gray, Alan Peshkin, Mary Stokrocki, Christine Barrowclough, Gillian Haddock, Richard Drake, Sandra Bucci, Richard Emsley, Natalie Berry and Til Wykes. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, BMC Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, Journal of Mental Health and Studies in Art Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026