Journal of Mental Health

2.3k papers and 45.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Journal of Mental Health in the last decades have received a total of 45.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Mental Health usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.2k papers), General Health Professions (876 papers) and Social Psychology (610 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (478 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (414 papers) and Patient and Public Engagement in Healthcare Research (387 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Mental Health are Patrick W. Corrigan, Julie Repper, Fred B. Bryant, Tim Carter, Larry Davidson, David L. Penn, Peter Bright, Michael Barkham, Anant Kumar and Kesavan Rajasekharan Nayar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Mental Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Mental Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Mental Health.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Mental Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Mental Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Mental Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Mental Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025