Emily Ang
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 1%
- Health Informatics top 1%
Papers in
-
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 7
- Health, psychology, and well-being 6
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 11
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 7
- Co-authors
- Shefaly Shorey (19 shared papers)M Kamala Devi (8 shared papers)Siew Tiang Lau (9 shared papers)Fernando Gómez‐Pinilla (1 shared paper)Violeta López (6 shared papers)Desley Hegney (2 shared papers)Tang Ching Lau (3 shared papers)John Yap (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Emily Ang
60 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Research and Theory 119
- Health Informatics 98
- Leadership and Management 69
- Family Practice 99
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 47
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Ang
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Ang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Ang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Ang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Ang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Ang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Ang. The network helps show where Emily Ang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Ang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 146 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 139 | |
| 4 | Learning styles, preferences and needs of generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 123 |
| 5 | 2007 | 107 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 100 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 95 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 94 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 82 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 74 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 70 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 62 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 53 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 46 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 46 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 44 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 41 |
About Emily Ang
Emily Ang is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology and Oncology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (11 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (8 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (7 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (119 citations), Health Informatics (98 citations), Leadership and Management (69 citations), Family Practice (99 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (47 citations). Emily Ang has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Finland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Shefaly Shorey, M Kamala Devi, Siew Tiang Lau, Fernando Gómez‐Pinilla, Violeta López, Desley Hegney, Tang Ching Lau, John Yap, Esperanza Debby Ng and Chee‐Kong Chui. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Supportive Care in Cancer, Nurse Education in Practice and International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.